Fourteen-inch tires in Russia are gaining more and more popularity, and new items in this size appear much more often than 13-inch tires.
Today we introduce you to the test results summer tires dimensions 185 / 60R14 with speed index "H" (210 km / h). But first, a few words about the equipment, without which full testing would be impossible.
About the features alloy wheels(more correct all the same - wheels, but tradition!) the magazine wrote more than once. Now let's look at them from the perspective of a tire tester. For ten years now, we have been mounting tires for testing on aluminum alloy rims. First produced by K & K, then by Vikom, and now RW brand wheels are in our field of vision. But why do we prefer light-alloy ones?
Try to mount-unmount the tire several times on a regular steel rim. Even with professional tire changers, scratches on the rim edges cannot be avoided. Over time, these places will be decorated with corrosion, and every year or two the discs will have to be cleaned, primed and painted.
The second reason: light-alloy wheels are made, as a rule, much more accurate, so with them there is less measurement error when testing tires.
The third reason: light-alloy wheels better dissipate heat from the brakes through the hub section - therefore, with repeated braking on the verge of skid or using ABS, the results are more stable.
The next criterion is that the discs are more convenient for washing. It is one thing to wash four wheels, and quite another to wash sixty.
The fifth trick - we choose discs with a flat hub part or with the smallest wells for fastening bolts - otherwise it is inconvenient to bait them. And although we are now replacing the bolts with studs with nuts on the carrier vehicle, we still avoid deep wells.
Over the years of intensive use, we have not found any flaws in the K&K and Vicom drives. We hope that RW will be at its best. In any case, there were no complaints about them at the first, summer stage.
The test methodology has also undergone minor changes. First, to traditional braking with locked wheels ( domestic cars until, unfortunately, they are not equipped with ABS), we added braking on the verge of skidding: on dry asphalt - from a speed of 100 km / h, on wet - from 80 km / h.
The second addition - at the request of readers, they introduced an assessment of the performance of tires on dirt road... This indicator is not included in the overall offset, it only serves additional information for those whose routes go not only on asphalt.
The tests were carried out on a Kalina hatchback (VAZ-11193), which should go on sale this year.
The overall impression of the move from 13 inches to 14 inches is that the handling has improved - it is no coincidence that its scores are generally higher than in last year's 175 / 75R13 tire test. However, there is also a minus - tires of an increased dimension are stiffer and noisier - the low (less energy-intensive) sidewall and a wide contact patch affect. However, it is thanks to the latter feature that braking on these tires is more effective.
Those who are only planning to put 14 instead of 13 inches for the summer should keep in mind that they will pay for improving grip with a decrease in comfort, first of all, ride smoothness. In addition, tires and wheels "14" are significantly more expensive.
Let's summarize the results obtained and, on their basis, try to analyze the situation on the tire market. An interesting observation - Bridgestone is beginning to lag behind famous brands such as Michelin, Continental and Pirelli. Even "Yokohama" and "Toyo" are gradually overtaking the eminent compatriot. It is also obvious that the Finnish Nokian is moving to the forefront. Russian manufacturers are slowly but surely improving their summer products. Amtel is the leader in the home market.
Imported tires are mainly focused on cars with ABS, therefore they are less willing to brake with a skid. Nevertheless, there are those that effectively slow down in any way.
All tire manufacturers, including Russian ones, are fighting for the stability of grip properties and their proximity on dry and wet surfaces. But the achievements are not the same for everyone. There is one more trend noted last year. Improved grip on asphalt leads to a deterioration on dirt roads and grass. Mushroom pickers, berry farmers and summer residents living in the outback should take a closer look at the tires of the "m + s" category.
Nokian NRHi ecosport
1st place
Manufacturer - Finland
922.1 points
Tread depth - 7.4-8.7 mm
Tire weight - 6.8 kg
Price in Moscow - 2600 rubles.
Value for money - 2.82
Finnish manufacturers of very good winter tires have achieved their goal] - 2590 rubles.
Value for money - 2.81
Summer Michelin just falls short of first place. It is surprisingly well balanced - no bright bursts, no obvious dips. Economy - excellent, in terms of comfort - the best (sharing this place with the "Bridge"). The handling is good on wet asphalt, and even better on dry! Exchange rate stability - no comments. The brakes are especially good on wet, although dry is great - but here and there on the verge of a block. Alas, the ABS-oriented tires are a weak link by Russian standards! Especially sharply they break into a block in the most innocuous situation - on dry asphalt. The primer, as for Pirelli, is allowed in limited doses.
Excellent brakes on the verge of blocking, a complex of lateral grip properties and driving characteristics, high efficiency and comfort.
Weak skid braking.
Highly recommended for asphalt roads for those who like comfortable and economical driving. The brakes are most effective with ABS.
Pirelli p6
3rd place
Manufacturer - Spain
918.5 points
Tread depth - 8.5 mm
Tire weight - 7.5 kg
Price in Moscow - 2500 rubles.
Value for money - 2.72
Like Yokohama, Pirelli gravitates towards sports.
For such tires, efficiency is not the main thing, apparently because here they go in the middle peasants.
Ride and noise are also sacrificed for handling and directional stability. The record holder for speed on the "rearrangement". The difference from Yokohama is that the grip properties and behavior are more stable, regardless of the condition of the coating.
The brakes are excellent on the verge of blocking, although having slipped into a slip, they stop the car quite well. It is noteworthy that the blocking edge feels very good on dry and wet asphalt.
The deep tread will provide long-term stability of performance parameters.
You can move along the primer, but carefully and in the absence of rain.
The best brakes on the verge of slipping, excellent handling and directional stability on any surface.
Low comfort.
We strongly recommend fans of a sporty style of driving on asphalt in any weather.
Continental ContiEcoContact 3
4th place
Manufacturer - Germany
911.3 points
Tire weight - 6.9 kg
Price in Moscow - 2300 rubles.
Value for money - 2.52
Eco Conti is not particularly economical, although in last year's test the same tires in the 13-inch version were in the lead here, and the overall results were better.
In terms of comfort, "Conti" are very similar to "Toyo". Small remarks only on the smoothness of the course.
There are no complaints about handling. "Kalina" clearly performs the "rearrangement". True, on wet asphalt there is a little lack of information content - only for this reason they could not develop a higher speed.
The brakes are great! The best in sliding, but on the verge of skidding, they are not inferior to anyone.
The primer is not for these tires, good asphalt is more suitable for them.
The best in skid braking on any asphalt, very good and on the edge, good handling and directional stability.
Small remarks on the smoothness of the ride.
Recommended especially for asphalt roads with different driving styles.
Yokohama A539
5th place
Manufacturer - Japan
908.8 points
Tire weight - 7.4 kg
Price in Moscow - RUB 2395 *
Value for money - 2.64
Features - asymmetric tread pattern
А539 - tires of sport orientation. This is what you will get maximum pleasure from active driving! Somewhat more economical than "Toyo", but lacking comfort - very hard, shaking and noisy. But all this can be forgiven for the excellent handling and excellent directional stability. Kalina performs a "rearrangement" on dry asphalt just fine! Even in sliding, the car is very predictable. The behavior on the wet is not so polished, but without remarks. The dry brakes are perhaps the best. It is noteworthy that any method of braking gives excellent results. True, on a wet one - only an average level.
There is some deterioration in grip on wet asphalt.
The best brakes on dry asphalt for any kind of braking, the best handling on dry asphalt, very good directional stability on a straight line.
Medium wet brakes, low comfort.
We especially recommend to fans of fast driving on dry asphalt.
Toyo Proxes CF 1
6th place
Manufacturer - Japan
903.3 points
Tread depth - 6.9-7.6 mm
Tire weight - 7.0 kg
Price in Moscow - 1920 rubles.
Value for money - 2.13
Features - asymmetric tread pattern
Unlike Bridgestone, these "Japanese" crossed the 900-point threshold - an excellent result for the "second line" brand.
In terms of fuel efficiency, the Toyo is average, and in terms of comfort it is similar to the Kleber (the Japanese seemed quieter).
The handling is good and stable on any surface. The brakes on a wet one are even slightly better than on a dry one (on the "rearrangement" the same alignment), and the spread with different methods of braking is less than that of the "Bridgestone".
In general, the tires are fairly flat, with no dips or splashes.
On a dirt road, as well as on "Kleber", we advise you to move down only where there are no steep climbs and humidity.
Best wet brakes with locked wheels, very good on any surface when braking on the edge, handling is good and stable on any surface.
Modest runout.
Highly recommended as an all-weather tire for good asphalt roads.
Bridgestone Turanza GR-80
7th place
Manufacturer - Japan
898.8 points
Tread depth - 7.5 mm
Tire weight - 8.4 kg
Price in Moscow - 2490 * rubles.
Value for money - 2.77
Features - directional tread pattern
Something strange has been happening with the tires of this brand lately. And not only in formula 1. The most voracious and the most difficult. Perhaps they are very durable and are not afraid of pits and rubbing against curbs. Nevertheless, in terms of comfort, one of the best. Handling on dry pavement is better than on wet pavement, where a quick turn of the steering wheel is fraught with wheel breakdown. The brakes on dry surfaces are noticeably better than on wet ones. The same pattern applies to the "rearrangement".
A feature of tires is a decrease in grip on wet asphalt.
Driving on a dirt road is acceptable but not desirable.
Excellent brakes on dry (on the edge), excellent handling on dry asphalt and good on wet, high level of comfort.
High consumption fuel at low and medium speeds.
Recommended for lovers of comfortable driving for asphalt roads.
* Manufacturer's recommended price.
Kleber Dynaxer HP 2
8th place
Manufacturer - France
882.2 points
Tread depth - 7.6 mm
Tire weight - 6.8 kg
Price in Moscow - 2200 rubles.
Value for money - 2.49
On smooth roads, small errors in ride smoothness and noise are unlikely to appear; on mediocre surfaces, the tires' low ability to smooth out small irregularities is annoying.
Handling without remarks and preferences for the surface - good and stable both on dry and wet.
The brakes are effective only on the edge of skid. On dry asphalt, its edge is felt very well, but on wet tires they break off abruptly, in addition, they noticeably lose in the braking distance to their closest competitors.
It is better not to leave the asphalt] - 2400 rubles.
Value for money - 2.72
Features - asymmetric tread pattern
These tires won't set the record for fuel economy, but they won't ruin increased consumption... The comfort is quite decent, especially the smoothness of the ride. Somewhat annoying squeak at the beginning of tire slippage when starting and braking. However, someone might like it. On flooded asphalt "Kalina" handles better than on wet or dry. Brakes on the verge of skidding on dry asphalt are the best, on wet in the same mode they are also good. By the way, the edge of wheel blocking on wet asphalt is felt just fine. Driving on a dirt road is possible only in dry weather.
The best brakes on the verge of a block on dry asphalt, very good on wet with any braking method, good ride, handling on wet.
Low complex of lateral grip properties and drift characteristics on dry asphalt, high rolling resistance at low speeds.
Recommended only for asphalt roads.
Amtel Planet 2P
10th place
Manufacturer - Russia
855 points
Tread depth - 7.7 mm
Tire weight - 7.0 kg
Price in Moscow - 1250 rubles.
Value for money - 1.46
Amtel is the leader among post-Soviet tires. What is remarkable about it?
In terms of fuel efficiency, he won over everyone, but this is where, apart from the good smoothness of the ride, the advantages of Amtel end. The noise rating is mediocre.
The handling is at a modest level, the speed at the "rearrangement" is low, on any surface the car behaves "smeared".
It is possible to brake reliably, as on the Kama, only on dry asphalt, and only with a skid. On wet road the distance is better to keep a little more, since you have to calculate the stopping distance with a margin.
You can move off the asphalt only in dry weather.
The best in terms of economy, decent braking on dry pavement (per block), good ride.
Bad brakes on the verge of slipping on any surface, and skidding on wet asphalt. Loud noise.
Recommended for those who love economical driving.
Kama Euro 224
11th place
Manufacturer - Russia (NkShZ)
842.4 points
Tread depth - 7.0-8.2 mm
Tire weight - 7.5 kg
Price in Moscow - 1250 rubles.
Value for money - 1.48
Nizhnekamsk also lack stars from the sky, although in the overall standings they are slightly ahead of MShZ and Rosava.
Efficiency "Euro" - at an average level, which can not be said about comfort - the tire is hard and noisy.
There are no serious complaints about handling, but there is no enthusiasm either. The lack of information content on the steering wheel did not allow achieving high speed on the "rearrangement".
The brakes are good only on dry asphalt, but only with skidding. Emergency braking without blocking gives a very modest result.
But in terms of cross-country ability - the best. Of course, they do not turn into an all-terrain vehicle "Kalina", but they go on a wet dirt road and on wet grass.
Good brakes on dry asphalt with locked wheels, good cross-country ability.
Poor brakes on wet with any type of braking and dry braking on the verge of blocking, high rolling resistance, hard.
Recommended for all roads.
Rosava BC-49
12th place
Manufacturer - Ukraine
804.5 points
Tread depth - 6.4-6.9 mm
Tire weight - 7.4 kg
Price in Moscow - 950 rubles.
Value for money - 1.18
Summer "Rosava" for the first time participates in the tests of the ZR. The level of Ukrainian tires is quite modest - slightly better than Leader, but in general, both outsiders are on the same level. It will not be possible to save fuel on these tires - the consumption is too high. The level of comfort is noticeably better than that of the "Taganka" - the ride is the same, but the "Ukrainians" are much quieter.
Handling scores are the lowest. The Kalina, shod in Rosava, has a slow reaction to steering on dry asphalt, but on wet asphalt you have to turn it very smoothly, otherwise you risk losing grip.
The brakes are effective only when the wheels are locked.
You can only drive on dirt roads on dry land.
Low level noise, not bad brakes"On the block", decent cross-country ability.
Poor handling in extreme modes, poor brakes on the verge of wheel locking, low directional stability.
Recommended for all roads with careful driving.
Taganca M-238 Leader
13th place
Manufacturer - Russia (MShZ)
793 points
Tread depth - 7.5 mm
Tire weight - 7.0 kg
Price in Moscow - 900 rubles.
Value for money - 1.13
Features - asymmetric tread pattern
The only tire that did not score 800 points in the test. Showed only good fuel efficiency. With comfort, the situation is contradictory - the ride is almost good, but the noise is the strongest, like from winter studded tires. Handling is tolerable only on dry asphalt, on wet "Kalina" unexpectedly breaks into a deep skid, which only a well-trained driver can handle. The brakes are frankly weak.
The peculiarity of these tires is a sharp drop in grip on wet surfaces. Drive off the asphalt with a glance - "Leader" can slip into a slip even on a dry primer.
Good fuel efficiency, decent ride.
Low grip on wet surfaces, poor brakes and directional stability, loud noise.
Recommended for economical unhurried driving - and more careful on wet!
Rating table
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
Za Rulem magazine, March 2006
author: Sergey MISHIN. Together with the author, the tests were carried out by Anton ANANIEV, Yury KUROCHKIN, Evgeny LARIN, Anton MISHIN, Andrey OBRAZUMOV and Valery PAVLOV.
Changing tires is a mandatory procedure that motorists undergo twice a year.
Finding tons of tips on how to choose winter or summer tires on the web is easy. You can also ask the seller which rubber is best for cold or hot weather. However, there is one feature that is very often overlooked: the fact is that in the summer season, a lot of people go to the country. Accordingly, the asphalt is replaced by a dirt road. And this leaves a certain imprint on choosing the right tires.
Important rules for choosing tires for city and country trips
When planning to drive on dirt and asphalt roads, it is very important to choose "fresh" rubber that will last a long time and will not crack from temperature extremes. The manufacturer must indicate the stamping date. If the seller hides it for some reason, then the fresher product can be identified by its color - it will be saturated black. The shade of old rubber becomes recognizable gray. For active summer trips, you need tires no more than a year old.
Choosing a tread pattern for summer
Sellers now offer three options for summer protectors:
- asymmetric;
- symmetrical directional;
- symmetrical non-directional.
The asymmetrical pattern with deeply traced grooves allows for good grip on the asphalt road. Moreover, if it suddenly rains, it is better to reduce the speed to a minimum, such a protector does not remove water from under the wheels. Symmetrical tires with non-directional patterns are good against aquaplaning. However, it is they who do not behave well on unpaved tracks, since dirt is stuffed into the grooves, small stones get there, which get stuck in the gaps and reduce traction. Tires with directional symmetrical patterns will be somewhat more comfortable. For such
Tire makers have long caught up with car makers in terms of the speed of new models being introduced to the market. Even specialists are not immediately able to find their bearings in new products, and even more so, it is difficult for ordinary car enthusiasts.
To facilitate this task, this review-rating of common summer models tires. Let's make a reservation right away, if some models are not included in this rating, this does not mean that they are worse than those mentioned. The fact is that some tires have not yet received sufficient distribution in our country and because of this they cannot yet enter the rating.The main struggle for leadership unfolded between the traditional market leaders Continental, Nokian and Bridgestone. And if the first two brands were long-standing competitors, now Bridgestone has also shown an improvement in the characteristics of its products, approaching the recognized market leaders.
This assessment of summer tires is carried out on a 100-point scale. First of all, we will evaluate the driving performance, comfort, as well as specifications and the price. We deliberately left aside the design assessment, because, firstly, this question is rather for an amateur, someone likes one tread pattern, another is different. Secondly, now the fashion of ten years ago has passed, when everyone wanted either low-profile protectors, or with a pattern "as on racing cars". Now everyone is interested in more practical questions: how it drives, how it slows down, how long it will take on our roads, etc.
12th place Premiorri Solazo V.
The only serious advantage of this model is the low price achieved through manufacturing in Ukraine. This became possible thanks to the contract between Premiorri and the Ukrainian plant Rosava.
Primiorri Solazo has been produced since 2010, at the same time supplies to the Russian market began.
The car "shod" in Solazo does not give a feeling of comfort, the steering wheel is extremely light, there is absolutely no feedback from the steering wheel. In order to clearly control the lane, you have to make a lot of unnecessary movements and twist the steering wheel to large angles.
With sudden changes of lane, the reaction to the steering wheel is delayed, control over handling is reduced, up to a complete loss. Braking is equally hesitant on dry and wet asphalt.
The softness indicators are very good, any irregularities are extinguished, but at the same time the rumble from the tread is very noticeable. The rolling quality is not up to par, in neutral the speed begins to drop rapidly. But when driving on a dirt road, they give a feeling of confidence.
+ Pros: Smooth, soft ride. Clear movement on the dirt road.
- Cons: Poor road holding. Loses controllability during sharp maneuvering. Increases fuel consumption. Noisy.
These tires should be looked at by supporters of measured driving, who often have to go on unpaved surfaces.
RATING: 80.6 / 100 POINTS
11th place Viatti Strada Asimmetrico V.
The beautiful Italian name did not help Nizhnekamsk producers much, although if we take the price / quality combination, then Viatti certainly gives good indicators.
Braking is frankly weak, on dry surfaces it wins only against Premiorri and Cordiant, on wet surfaces - an obvious outsider, perhaps a little better than Yokagama. The level of communication with the steering wheel and information content is very similar to the "Premiorri", it also needs constant steering. Although at low speeds the changes are quite clear, especially at the beginning of the maneuver, but at the end there is still a slight skid. On wet asphalt, when changing lanes, you can feel the front part of the car, which requires a quick steering response.
Comfort from "Viatti" is also very doubtful, pulsating noise is constantly heard, the slightest irregularities of the road are transmitted to the body by vibration and jolts. With equal pumping rear wheels seem tougher. Good rolling performance contributes to fuel economy. They are confident on a dirt road.
+ Pros: Confident control of the machine on a dirt road.
- Cons: Poor grip and poor maneuvering on any surface. Lack of sufficient comfort.
This model is suitable for moderate driving on good roads, and for unpaved surfaces.
RATING: 83/100 POINTS
10th place Yokohama C.drive 2 V.
Despite the average test results, the model made in the Philippines is not offered at an average price, which certainly does not speak in its favor. It has appeared on the Russian market since 2010.
Braking performance is almost identical to that shown by Viatti, and on the wet road - an absolute outsider in the rating.
At high speeds, they clearly hold the road, but when maneuvering, there is not enough information content and steering is required. In case of sudden rearrangements, there is clearly not enough steering angle, which is why you have to turn the steering wheel to large angles.
At maximum speeds, it gives a deep skid, which can be corrected by a driver with a good reaction.
On a flat road, the tread makes a moderate noise, which increases noticeably on rough asphalt and on small bumps. Vibrations from small irregularities are clearly transmitted to the body.
In terms of rolling measurements, Yokohama tires showed the most best result, at any speed give good fuel economy. Demonstrate uncertain behavior on a dirt road.
+ Pros: Thanks to good rolling, it saves fuel at any speed. Good stability.
- Cons: Very poor braking on wet roads, poor handling during emergency maneuvers.
These tires will be appreciated by those for whom fuel economy is important.
RATING: 83.9 / 100 POINTS
9th place Cordiant Sport 2 (PS-501) V.
The model is a domestic development, with a good price / quality ratio.
"Cordiant-Sport 2" first appeared on sale in 2010, then it was replaced in 2012 by a modernized version.
The tires showed the worst braking performance on dry roads. The difference in stopping distance between the leader of the test and "Kordiant" was almost 6 meters. At the same time, on wet surfaces, the performance is noticeably better and can qualify for a satisfactory grade.
At high speeds, they confidently keep a straight line, but the information content is still not enough, moreover, there is a delay in the reactions.
On a dry road, extreme maneuvering at medium speeds is possible, attempts to do it at a higher speed are very difficult due to low information content and increased steering angles. When maneuvering on wet asphalt, at the beginning, the front wheels slip outward, as if straightening the trajectory, because of this, you have to turn the steering wheel to the desired angle, which, again, is not just due to poor information content.
Tires dampen large irregularities well, but on medium-sized ones, they transmit shaking to the body. And with small cracks or roughness, they begin to make a distinct noise.
They roll badly, which negatively affects fuel consumption. Driving on a dirt road with Cordiant-Sport 2 is a dubious pleasure.
+ Pros: Quite passable handling and directional stability on dry surfaces. Quite comfortable movement.
- Cons: Very inconclusive dry braking and heavy maneuvering on wet asphalt. Increases fuel consumption.
Suitable for city driving, with trips to the suburbs.
RATING: 85.7 / 100 POINTS
8th place Goodyear EfficientGrip V.
The French model did not receive a higher rating primarily due to the high price.
This Goodear model has been produced since 2009 and hit the Russian market in 2010.
Braking ratings are quite good. On both wet and dry asphalt, the average performance of the tested tires was obtained.
At high speeds, the car "floats" slightly, alignment is difficult due to the lagging steering wheel.
What you should definitely not do on these tires is sudden lane changes. On dry surfaces, you have to limit the speed due to the noticeable drift of the front wheels at the beginning of the maneuver and skidding of the rear at the end. On a wet surface, the situation is a little better, but the picture is spoiled by large turning angles and sharp breaks into a skid when exiting it.
The tires demonstrated the traditional Goodyear level of comfort, with a soft and quiet ride. "Efficient" help to save fuel, especially in the suburban driving cycle. Departure on a primer without special need is not recommended.
+ Pros: Excellent level of comfort, fuel economy when traveling out of town.
- Cons: Directional stability is below average, heavy handling during extreme maneuvers.
Goodyear Efficent Grip good suitable for amateurs comfortable and economical ride.
RATING: 87.1 / 100 POINTS
7th place Dunlop SP Sport 9000 W.
This japanese model has already become a veteran in our tire market, but at the same time, it is still in considerable demand.
Braking performance on dry roads is below average, and even less on wet ones. Only Yokohama and Viatti have worse performance.
At high speeds, it keeps its course perfectly. The main distinguishing feature of the Dunlop SP Sport is clear reactions to the steering wheel, it is very easy to adjust the course. On dry surfaces, sharp maneuvers can be carried out at medium speed. It instantly reacts to the steering wheel at the beginning of the maneuver, although then there is a slight demolition of the front end, with a simultaneous drop in the steering wheel information content. On wet roads, maneuverability is improved and emergency lane changes can be made at higher speeds. However, when the maximum speed is exceeded, a slide off the course occurs, and simultaneously on both axes. After drifting or skidding, adhesion to the surface is quickly restored.
The level of driving comfort with Dunlop is low, the tread rustles distinctly, the noise increases noticeably on rough asphalt. Any minor irregularities in the road are transmitted to the body.
The tires showed good rolling performance. Provide confident movement on the dirt road.
+ Pros: High directional stability at high speeds, excellent movement on a dirt road. Provides an economical ride.
- Cons: Bad level comfort. Poor braking on wet asphalt.
These tires are perfect for long journeys on roads with smooth and hard surfaces.
RATING: 87.6 / 100 POINTS
6th place Hankook Ventus Prime 2 (К 115) V.
Hungarian tires have shown good performance and in all fairness we can say that it is from their 6th place that the elite group of very good tires begins.
Tires are new to Russian market, the start of sales started in 2012.
Ventus Prime have demonstrated excellent braking qualities, especially well proved to be on the wet road, on dry surfaces a little weaker, but still quite good.
Keeping course well at high speeds, however, slightly lacking information for heading corrections. Another "sin" is the delay in steering response. On dry pavement, maneuvers at speeds above average are permissible. Light drifts at the exit from the maneuver are fairly easily leveled out. A wet road has practically no negative impact on the nature of the management and the success of rebuilding.
The tires are quite noisy; when driving at speeds above 80 km / h, the feeling of riding on all-terrain treads is created. Ventus Prime behaves rigidly on all surfaces and increases fuel consumption at all speeds. The indicators of movement on the primer are average.
+ Pros: Brakes well on any surface. Demonstrates stable handling.
- Cons: Increases fuel consumption. Notes on noise comfort and directional stability.
Good tires for paved roads.
RATING: 89.9 / 100 POINTS
5th place Toyo Praxes T1 Sport W.
This Japanese manufacturer has repeatedly proven the success of its brand, which is invariably present in the top of many tire ratings.
The model has been presented in Russia since the end of 2009.
Braking distances on dry roads are average and above average on wet asphalt.
Directional stability at high speeds is good, the tires give ease of course corrections and smoothness when changing lanes. The steering response is crisp and the steering angles are small. A wet coating practically does not change the characteristics, only a slightly faster reaction is required with extreme drift.
Toyo Praxes tires are quite quiet, only when driving on rough asphalt they become a little louder. Small irregularities in the road give off vibrations to the body. Fuel consumption readings are average, with increasing speeds they increase consumption. Driving on a dirt road is average.
+ Pros: Stable handling on dry and wet surfaces.
- Cons: Increased fuel consumption during out-of-town trips. Minor complaints about smoothness and noise.
Good tires for mixed highway / city driving.
RATING: 91.5 / 100 POINTS
4th place Michelin Primacy HP V.
The German brand, as always, is at its best and, despite the sufficient age of the model, about 8 years, is still in demand.
The model demonstrates excellent braking performance, similar to the previous model in the rating. Performance is slightly weaker than Toyo's on wet roads and slightly better on dry.
The tires keep the direction well and provide adequate responses during course corrections.
On a dry road, he demonstrates clear behavior with clear reactions. On wet surfaces, the performance drops slightly. By avoiding sudden steering movements, drifts will be minimized.
When driving on a good road, no extraneous noise is emitted. Irregularities and road joints are reflected on the body by sudden jerks.
Help conserve fuel during moderate driving. When driving on the highway, they give average indicators of efficiency. The primer is medium tolerated.
+ Pros: Stable handling. Fuel economy.
- Cons: Minor complaints about ride and noise.
Suitable for urban and suburban use.
RATING: 91.7 / 100 POINTS
3rd place Pirelli Cinturato P7 V.
An excellent Romanian model, who slightly lost her last year's positions in front of the newcomers, but still remains on the podium. In addition, it is the best model in terms of price / quality ratio. Pirelli Cinturato has been sold in Russia since 2010.
The tires show excellent braking performance, especially on wet surfaces.
There are no complaints about directional stability at high speeds. They allow you to make maneuvers at high speeds, on dry roads they allow you to make sharp lane changes.
The driving style and the lack of surprises are reminiscent of Michelin and Bridgestone. Demonstrate high speed on wet asphalt, only half a kilometer was not enough to reach a record this test... The reactions on the steering wheel are very clear, if not for the sharp drifts at the exit from the turn, there could be a maximum score.
Pirelli Cinturato are a little noisy, they spank at the joints. Small irregularities are transmitted to the body. Regardless of the driving mode, they have no particular effect on consumption or fuel economy. Not very suitable for priming.
+ Pros: They brake well on any surface. Provide good handling.
- Cons: High noise level, not very smooth running.
An excellent choice for dynamic drivers, as well as for frequent out-of-town trips.
RATING: 91.9 / 100 POINTS
2nd place Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 V.
Fresh French model on the Russian market with a good price / quality ratio.
Record braking results on all types of asphalt. The difference in stopping distance between the outsider of the test "Kordiant" and "Conti Premium" was about 6 meters, with "Yokohama" more than 5 meters.
The tires allow for extreme maneuvers at high speeds, and the steering wheel provides clear and crisp responses. Characteristic feature"Continental" are large steering angles, which decrease as the tires warm up.
Wet surface does not negatively affect speed performance.
The tires demonstrated excellent comfort, perfectly dampen bumps and road noise. They give a good combination of soft yet firm driving.
The rolling level is average, roughly comparable to the Pirelli. Not suitable for ground coats.
+ Pros: Best braking performance on any road, excellent comfort.
- Cons: Notes on handling extreme driving on a dry road.
The average price in Russia is 4800 rubles.
The best tire in terms of braking performance.
RATING: 93.5 / 100 POINTS
1st place Bridgestone Potenza S001V.
A well-deserved place for the Japanese model.
Demonstrates excellent braking performance on all types of asphalt. The truth is slightly inferior to the "Continental" on dry, only a little bit, and 1 meter on wet.
The Bridgesone Potenza shows good directional stability, the same as the Dunlop. A characteristic feature of this model is a very clear response to course corrections. Absolute winner of the extreme maneuvering speed competition, on dry and wet asphalt. It should be noted the high degree of information content of the steering wheel, especially on a wet road.
Unfortunately, comfort falls short of the high level of driving performance. Irregularities and joints give off noise, rustling is clearly audible on the rough asphalt.
The rolling indicators are the same as those of the Continental and Pirelli, there is no particular savings, but they also do not add to fuel consumption. Not very suitable for priming.
+ Pros: Highly good braking... Clear directional stability, high speed maneuvers.
- Cons: The tires are noisy and harsh.
Perfect for country driving, on quality paved roads. Will appeal to fans of extreme driving.
RATING: 93.6 / 100 POINTS
When buying rubber, Russian motorists more and more often ask the question: "How long can these tires withstand domestic roads?" This material will give an answer to the topic "what kind of rubber to buy for the summer for bad roads?" and in general, "what critical damage to a tire does a poor-quality road surface and how to avoid them?"
The main reasons for this situation are that Russian roads are far from ideal, especially when it comes to non-megacities and large highways. Most regional roads, to put it mildly, are not very best quality””. Every car owner wants to protect the tires of his car from external damage, especially when it comes to new expensive tires.
Damage types
All tire damage can be roughly divided into two categories:
- "Bump" (aka "valbuka", "hernia");
- side cut.
Cone
A bump is a delamination of the side of the tire with or without a rupture of the tire carcass itself. This is due to the fact that the side part of the tire overheats as a result of the high deformation rate of a particular section of the tread at the moment of impact. How can you avoid such a nuisance?
What does a bump on rubber look like?
First of all, it is necessary to keep the tire pressure recommended by the manufacturer. This information is indicated either in the instruction manual of your vehicle, either in the opening of the driver's door, or on the inside of the fuel filler flap. It is there that the pressure will be indicated for a certain degree of machine load.
The ambient temperature can change the tire pressure. So, with its decrease, the pressure in the wheel also decreases. This happens as a result of an increase in the air density inside the tire. Accordingly, as the air temperature rises, the pressure also increases. It is recommended to initially increase the pressure in the tire by 10-15%, which will increase its endurance.
In theory, this will slow down the rate of deformation of the sidewall upon impact. In practice, of course, there is no one hundred percent guarantee, but the wheel has a chance to survive for bad road will increase significantly. However, comfort will suffer - the suspension will become more rigid, and the central part of the tread will begin to wear out a little faster. Everyone chooses for himself whether he is ready for such a compromise.
Do not think that tires marked Extra Load (XL) help not only withstand a large mass, but also protect against bump formation. This is not true! Apart from the increased weight load index, this wheel does not differ from the usual one.
So what should you buy? High profile tires! The width-to-height ratio must be greater than 55. For example, 195/65 / R15 is a high profile tire, but if instead of 65 it is written 55 or less, it is a low profile tire. The chances of getting the above damage on a high profile tire are lower. This is due to the fact that in a side impact, its energy is dissipated over a larger area than that of a low-profile tire, while the deformation rate of the sidewall is reduced. It is worth considering this when choosing tires.
Low and high profile tires were discussed in detail.
There are also negative consequences of such a choice - controllability will suffer. The car on high wheels becomes softer, as if it spreads on the asphalt, it is "driven".
The third recommendation would be to choose tires with a hard sidewall... The parameter is subjective, but the indisputable fact is that the stiffer sidewall contains more layers of rubber or more of the rubber compound itself, which resists damage well.
In contrast to this, an increase in wheel weight acts, which means that comfort will deteriorate, and fuel consumption will increase. Tire manufacturers have been trying to solve this problem for a long time - to reduce the weight of tires with a hard side or to increase strength. soft tires... There are even certain successes.
Ground tires. Their features and differences. Nuances of construction of MT and AT tires
The first cars were SUVs. All without exception! There were simply no other options then. But the asphalt pavements that appeared then gradually divided the cars into "parquet", all-terrain and completely off-road. Tractors, mining dump trucks and other agricultural and special equipment fell into the category of “completely off-road”. Their rubber has powerful lugs, reinforced sidewalls and is not suitable for driving at high speeds. True, they do not need it. After all, their purpose is to move and perform a variety of work on the ground, allowing not only to drive, but also to confidently maneuver. This rubber most often has a clearly pronounced directional herringbone pattern and, when slipping, throws out adhering clods of earth from the tread, preventing the tire from “blurring”, turning into a slick. The same or very similar rubber is used by athletes participating in road races on mud.
MT tire design and construction allows you to ride
on them on serious off-road and on paved roads
For snow and swamps, there is a different design of rubber - the so-called tires ultra low pressure... They not only easily overcome any swamps, but even give the car buoyancy. Wide "dutik" create so low ground pressure that they allow you to move, leaving almost no traces. Impressive! Why aren't ordinary SUVs fitted with these tires? The fact is that special off-road tires, firstly, are extremely poorly controlled on asphalt, secondly, they are not designed for high speed and, thirdly, they wear out very quickly on hard surfaces. Therefore, for cars that often drive onto the ground, they make a special, so-called "mud" rubber, which in the name has the abbreviation MT, which literally means Mud Terrain - for mud coverage. Its construction and design allow you to make both long runs on asphalt and fairly confident maneuvers on the ground. These tires are most often produced in large sizes, because they are usually placed on elevator cars. So the standard size of MT-rubber may not be found.
Let's take a look at the tread design of these tires using the popular Toyo Open Country MT mud tire as an example. First of all, the pattern is very aggressive, the blocks have a hook-shaped profile that allows them to literally bite into any soil with their teeth. The open, almost rectangular shoulder sipes act like gears, sinking into the ruts and allowing you to pull out, even if the ruts are very deep and slippery. But that's not all! The tread pattern of this MT tire does not end with the shoulder area, but continues further down the sidewall of the tire. Why is this done? Few people know that with high articulation of the suspension, the tire is often in contact with the ground only with its sidewall. And, of course, a tire with lugs on the sidewall will work much more efficiently in such a situation.
AT tires are designed for high mileage on asphalt
and confident movement on the ground, except for extreme off-road
Yes, but all this serves for confident work on the ground, but what about the asphalt? What about handling, wear and noise? For a long service life on hard surfaces, as well as reliable handling of the car, such a tire has a structure of three layers of polyester with a high curl of the edges (in conventional tires, two layers), which also gives high strength (significantly strengthens the entire tire carcass). And for excellent grip on wet asphalt ( the main problem all mud tires) there are deep sipes in the tread blocks. And to reduce noise and get rid of resonant hum, all tread parts have different sizes... But it is important to remember that such rubber is still for those who often drive into real mud, that is, for real off-road driving and even racing fans. For example, the Open Country MT model is actively used at the Dakar.
And for those who have a calmer temperament, who prefer to go around serious dirt, but still drive off the asphalt, there is a special class of rubber, which is designated by the abbreviation AT, or All Terrain, which literally means "for all surfaces." This rubber has a less aggressive tread pattern than MT and is built to last. But at the same time it allows you to confidently move along the ground. On the ground, not extreme off-road! And the dimensions allow you to install it instead of standard tires on a regular unprepared SUV or crossover. The design and construction of such tires are dictated by the peculiarities of their application. Consider AT tires using the example of the same Toyo Open Country, but this time with the designation A / T plus. Since these tires drive a lot on asphalt, gravel, rolled grader roads and dirt roads, the tread design is also quite aggressive, but at the same time it is far from the aggressiveness of MT. The tread pattern of the A / T plus is asymmetrical, allowing the outside of the tire to work as a sidewall off-road. The aggressive outer shoulder, typical of mud work, allows for firm grip on the ground in a rut. And the inner side of the tread serves for reliable grip on asphalt, providing excellent braking, controllability and high wear resistance, while reducing noise levels. The edges of the central blocks of the tread are stepped, this allows for increased forward and reverse traction on all types of soil. Well, and, of course, there was also high technology and a special composition of the rubber compound. Thanks to the addition of silicon dioxide, it improves wet performance and rolling resistance, which in turn reduces fuel consumption and increases service life. Clear? Well, let's move on.
High curvature of the carcass ply gives excellent handling and stability
REGULAR QUESTIONS
Very often the question arises of how to choose the right discs for MT-rubber when installed on an elevated machine. General rule this is - the disc should be two inches narrower than the tire. This allows the tire to properly tread at different pressures and not bend.
Whether it is necessary to balance oversized mud tires is another question. Our opinion is that if the imbalance of a tire measuring 33 inches or more is within 100 grams, there is no point in balancing the MT. It is very heavy in itself, and besides, having driven along the side of the road and hitting a large piece of dirt with the sidewall, you immediately disrupt the balance, and significantly. As a general rule, wash your tires and rims after each ride through mud and do not accelerate with MT-tires above 110 km / h. Then there will be no strong imbalance, and the tires will last a long time. AT tires are another matter. They are much lighter and are not prone to carrying dirt on themselves, and most importantly, they travel at much higher speeds. They, of course, need to be balanced.
How to choose the size of discs for mounting rubber
oversized and do you need to balance large wheels?
Another important issue is the choice of pressure when driving on asphalt. If we are talking about regular size tires, the answer is simple - see the manual. But when installing big tires the answer is no longer so obvious to an elevated SUV. The general rule is than bigger size tires in relation to the standard, the lower should be operating pressure in it on the asphalt. If the tire is inflated, then the central track quickly wears out, the car easily breaks into a slip and bounces unpleasantly at every junction of the asphalt. An under-inflated tire heats up noticeably and wears out quickly. It slows down in steering response and crumbles monstrously in corners. Determining the optimal pressure is not that difficult. If you have driven a dozen or two kilometers and the rubber tread is warm to the touch, the pressure in the tire is normal. If it is hot, and it is obviously felt with your hand, increase the pressure, it is too low. If the tread is completely cold, you can safely lower the pressure by a couple of tenths of an atmosphere and try it again. But we will tell you about how much tire pressure to use when driving on the ground in the following lessons.
