On the eve of the spring-summer season, the question of the choice of high-quality rubber arises. The seriousness of this issue should not be underestimated. Tires are one of the most important components of safe and comfortable driving.
In the article:
- the best summer tires R14;
- reviews;
- tests;
- video;
- prices;
- where can I buy.
Rating of the best summer tires 2018
It's time to figure out which summer tires are 14 better. Let's discuss the following brands in more detail:
- Toyo.
- Michelin.
- Nokian.
- Continental.
- Kumho.
- Bridgestone.
- Matador.
- Hankook.
- Amtel.
Toyo
Ruler tire toyo NanoEnergy 3 is the perfect solution for compact to mid-sized vehicles.
Specifications
The average price is 2300 rubles per piece.
- lack of noise;
- fuel efficiency.
- long braking distances on wet surfaces;
- sensitivity to road bumps.
The cabin has become much quieter. Fuel consumption has decreased, a trifle - but nice. Grip is excellent, the speed of 120 km / h is simply not felt. When braking, the car stops rooted to the spot. By the way, the brakes are the same on dry asphalt and on wet ones. Does not drive a car on wet asphalt. Of the minuses, the sidewalls are probably too soft.
Tests summer tires 185 / 60R14 allow you to compare tires of different brands, to identify the advantages and disadvantages of rubber. After reviewing the tire ratings based on independent testing, you can choose the best option for your car.
R14 summer tire tests make it possible to compare the following characteristics of tires of different brands:
- Aquaplaning. This term means a decrease in tire adhesion to the roadway, leading to a partial or complete loss of control over the machine.
- Braking. The distance that the car travels from the moment the braking system is reset to a complete stop is calculated.
- Controllability is the speed at which tires respond to steering commands.
- Vehicle stability. The ability of tires to withstand rollover or skidding is calculated vehicle.
- Wear. This concept means the rate of abrasion of tires when it comes into contact with the road surface while the car is moving.
- Profitability. Fuel consumption is calculated, if the pressure inside the tires is distributed correctly, then the volume of fuel consumed by the car decreases.
- Noisiness. Affects driving comfort, depends on the noise emitted by the tires while the car is moving.
- Rigidity. Summer tires should not be too soft.
- Resistant to high temperatures.
The best quality P14 tires for the summer showed good results in most of the tests carried out and took the leading positions.
First place
Tire Pirelli Cinturato P1In the manufacture of this rubber, innovative technologies were used. This made it possible to reduce the weight of the product and the noise while driving. The tires provide excellent vehicle handling. Advantages:
- high level of comfort, noise inside the car decreased by 1 dB;
- environmental friendliness, the product is subject to complete disposal;
- a special siping system reduces the risk of aquaplaning;
- quick response to steering commands;
- reduced fuel consumption;
- reduced rolling resistance.
Disadvantages: running smoothness is not the highest among the presented brands.
Second place
Tire Nokian Hakka Green The best rubber for the summer, made by a Finnish company. Intended for passenger cars, the products are recommended for use in regions where the air temperature is not more than 35 0 C. Tires provide a high level of machine control. Advantages:
- stability when driving on a wet road surface;
- vehicle maneuverability;
- tires practically do not heat up;
- increased resource;
- environmental friendliness;
- provide quiet, comfortable driving;
- low fuel consumption.
Disadvantages: no significant disadvantages.
Third place
Tire Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 Tires made from a rubber compound based on silicate and synthetic rubber. Thanks to this composition, excellent braking of the car is provided by wet road, fuel consumption is significantly reduced. Advantages:
- resistance to damage and deformation;
- reduction in fuel consumption;
- driving comfort;
- tires absorb noise;
- provide vehicle handling in difficult weather conditions;
- resistant to uneven wear;
- lack of aquaplaning effect.
Disadvantages: the average rate of exchange rate stability among competitors.
Fourth place
Car tire Nokian nordman SX These tires belong to the premium class, are developed using a thermoplastic rubber compound, and provide braking of the car on a wet road surface. Automobile tires are suitable for driving within the city and on suburban roads. Advantages:
- decrease in rolling resistance;
- fast braking;
- reduced fuel consumption;
- high level of comfort;
- little noise.
Disadvantages: handling and course stability on a dry surface is not the highest among the tested brands.
Fifth place
Hankook Kinergy Eco K425 Tire The tires are designed using special technologies to reduce vibration and reduce fuel consumption, suitable for driving on suburban roads. Advantages:
- effective braking on wet or dry asphalt;
- driving comfort;
- environmental friendliness;
- economical when driving at high and medium speeds.
Disadvantages: Average tire response to steering commands when driving on dry asphalt.
Sixth place
BFGoodrich g-Grip tire These tires are designed for a wide range of vehicles. They have a directional tread pattern. Suitable for driving around the city and country roads. Advantages:
- good directional stability of the car;
- vehicle maneuverability when cornering;
- lack of aquaplaning;
- reduction in fuel consumption;
- insignificant noise;
- good grip of the tire with the road surface.
Disadvantages: when driving on a wet road surface, the average indicator of handling and running smoothness.
Seventh place
GT Radial Champiro VP1 Tire - lack of aquaplaning effect;
- improved handling on wet road surfaces;
- the tires are practically silent;
- reduction of fuel consumption.
Disadvantages: their own the best sides car tires show when driving on a flat road surface, directional stability is low. The rubber is pretty tough.
Eighth place
Car tire Cordiant Road Runner The specified tires are designed for passenger cars... They have proven themselves very well in high-speed driving. Advantages:
- dynamic acceleration;
- resistance to external mechanical influences;
- a clear course when driving on a dry road;
- lack of noise while driving.
Disadvantages:
- long-term braking on a dry surface;
- difficult handling on a wet roadway;
- increased fuel consumption.
Ninth place
Tire Amtel Planet T-301 The tires have a block tread structure that allows the wheels to react quickly to steering commands. Tires have proven themselves well for driving on dirt roads, as well as country roads. Advantages:
- high cross-country ability;
- average braking performance on various road surfaces;
- are a budget option;
- noise reduction.
Disadvantages:
- increased fuel consumption;
- the occurrence of the aquaplaning effect when driving at high speeds on wet road surfaces.
Tenth place
Tire Pirelli cinturato P1 The tires are designed for SUV cars. They have an asymmetrical tread pattern. Suitable for country roads and urban conditions, designed for car movement on a good quality road surface. Advantages:
- average course stability;
- reduced fuel consumption
Disadvantages:
- weak braking on a wet surface;
- too tough.
Eleventh place
Bridgestone MY-02 Sporty Style Tire These tires are designed with a special tread layer for dynamic driving. The products are perfect for long trips. Advantages:
- average wheel reactions to steering commands;
- noiseless driving;
- reduced fuel consumption;
- comfort;
- long service life;
- resistance to mechanical stress.
Disadvantages: Difficulty driving when performing emergency maneuvers.
Twelfth place
Yokohama tires BluEarth AE-01 The composition of these tires is environmentally friendly, consists of self-renewable substances that do not harm nature and people. When driving on suburban roads, they can minimize fuel consumption. Advantages:
- reduction of fuel consumption by 10%;
- driving comfort;
- improved grip when driving on wet road surfaces;
- practically silent.
Disadvantages:
- low exchange rate stability;
- possible loss of control during extreme maneuvering;
- low speed rebuilding.
Thirteenth place
Nexen tire Classe Premiere 641 The tires have a unique tread structure that provides dynamic acceleration and high speed indicators when the vehicle is moving.
Advantages:
- low fuel consumption;
- reduction of noise while driving;
- driving comfort.
Disadvantages:
- weak inhibition;
- insufficient vehicle control on dry and wet road surfaces;
- slow response to steering commands.
Fourteenth place
Tire Barum Brillantis 2 The tires are excellent for driving on country roads with hard road surfaces. Automobile rubber practically does not create resistance while the car is moving and thus helps to reduce the consumption of the fuel mixture.
Advantages:
- normal course stability;
- driving comfort;
- long operational period;
- resistance to aquaplaning.
- fuel economy.
Disadvantages:
- slow braking;
- insufficient vehicle control on dry and wet road surfaces when performing emergency maneuvers.
Fifteenth place
Contyre Megapolis tire The composition of the rubber compound from which these tires are made includes a compound. It allows the tires to stay cool while the machine is in motion. The unique tread ensures the grip of the wheels on the road surface.
- the smallest indicator of braking and shifting speed among competitors;
- slow rubber response to steering commands;
- weak exchange rate stability;
- too tough.
Conclusion
The choice of tires P14 in our time is quite large. Manufacturers offer a wide range of products with various quality characteristics. Therefore, it is quite difficult to choose tires on your own, you need to spend time comparing the parameters of rubber of various brands. To simplify the choice of motorists, independent experts conduct tire tests, leave reviews, ratings of products offered on the car market.
What tires showed best performance can be judged by the results of the R14 summer tire test. It should be borne in mind that tires that have taken leading positions may not be suitable for the operating conditions of your car, plus they are not a budget option. Therefore, it is worth familiarizing yourself with the advantages and disadvantages of all brands in order to choose the best option.
Experts from the French magazine L "Argus compared tires budget class, 5 summer tires from third-tier brands took part in the test. Among budget tires, a premium tire was also tested.
All major tire manufacturers offer their customers tires of second-tier brands - BFGoodrich from Michelin, Uniroyal from Continental, Fulda from Goodyear, etc. Fitting these tires will save you a lot, but if you want to increase your savings even further, you need to turn to third-tier brands such as Kormoran, Barum or Sava. So, in their test of budget summer tires, the French experts took five tires, the price of which on the French market varies from 38 to 45 euros per piece. For greater clarity, L'Argus magazine decided to buy a premium tire - Dunlop, worth 52 euros for comparison. The Dunlop SP StreetResponse tires allowed experts not only to compare the performance of third-tier brands, but also to monitor changing conditions during tests.
The tests were carried out at the Goodyear Dunlop Proving Ground in Mireval, France, as well as in the company's laboratory in Luxembourg. The handling tests used two compact hatchback Ford fiesta 1.0 Ecoboost, in other tests - Fiesta 1.6. The tires were inflated according to the manufacturer's recommendations (2.1 bar front and 1.8 bar rear). All tires tested were purchased from regular stores.
Braking on wet asphalt
- Braking was carried out from 50 and 80 to 1 km / h, after which the braking distance was calculated to a complete stop. To determine changes in conditions (wind, air humidity, temperature), reference Dunlop tires... Within each test, test pilots made five runs.
Braking on wet asphalt from a speed of 50 km / h, meters
- When braking from 50 km / h, the premium Dunlop was the best, but three of the budget tires performed very well. At the same time, the last Dayton tires needed 2.5 meters more to stop than the Dunlop. With an increase in the speed of the beginning of braking to 80 km / h, the Kormoran tires and Sava, the former stopping more than 2 meters earlier than the more expensive Dunlop. As for the Dayton, they receive a red card in this discipline, since their stopping distance is almost 8 meters longer than that of the Kormoran, which is the length of two Renault Clio.
Braking on wet asphalt from a speed of 80 km / h, meters
Dry braking
- Test pilots stopped the car at speeds of 90 and 130 to 1 km / h, after which they also determined the braking distance to 0 km / h. On dry road surfaces, the Dayton tires that failed in previous tests performed best.
Dry braking drive at a speed of 90 km / h, meters
- If at a speed of 90 km / h Dayton tires stopped the car before all other tires, then with an increase in the start of braking to 130 km / h, they gave way to Sava tires. The last places in both disciplines were taken by Kingstar and Barum, with the last tires from 130 km / h stopping the car 5 m further than the leader of this test Sava.
Braking on dry asphalt at a speed of 130 km / h, meters
Resistant to longitudinal aquaplaning
- As part of this discipline, the car was driven on a track, half of which was covered with a 7mm layer of water. The test drivers gradually increased the speed by 5 km / h, the test was carried out until the tires began to lose grip on the wet road. The higher the speed that the tires could withstand, the more resistant they are to aquaplaning.
Successful completion of this test is possible only with a well-designed tread pattern. So the first places in this discipline are occupied by Dunlop and Sava, which have wide longitudinal grooves. Kormoran also demonstrate good result and Barum and especially Kingstar and Dayton begin to surface at relatively low speeds.
Traction loss rate, km / h
Handling on dry and wet asphalt
- The wet handling test was conducted on an irrigated track with a constantly maintained water depth. Parameters such as tractive effort, lateral stability, maneuverability, grip at corner entry, braking efficiency and information content were evaluated. The dry track tests were carried out in the same way.
- On the wet track, the tires split into two groups - leaders and laggards. The Dunlop and Kormoran tires behaved very similarly, both showed good handling and predictable behavior at the grip limit, and the Sava tires performed similarly. But the tires Kingstar, Dayton and Barum could not boast of decent results on the wet road surface. Kingstar tires noticeably lack traction, Dayton skid easily in corners, and then find traction again with great difficulty. and Barum are very nervous at all, and their reactions to steering generally quite difficult to predict. On the dry track, the differences between the tires were less pronounced, but even there the Barum lagged behind its competitors.
Wet handling
- This test was carried out in accordance with industry standards using two microphones on either side of the track and a sonometer measuring the noise level in decibels with the vehicle's engine off. Test pilots performed eight runs on each tire. The 3 dB difference between the quietest Kormoran and the three last tied tires is significant, as it doubles the volume to the human ear and will also be noticeable in the cabin.
Rolling resistance
- Before this test, each tire inflated to 2.1 bar was rotated on the bench at 120 km / h without load for three hours. After that, pressure was applied to it, equivalent to 80% of the maximum load that the tire must withstand. After several measurements, it was determined how much energy is needed to move a car weighing 1 ton.
- The share of tires accounts for up to 20% of fuel consumption, recently tire manufacturers are especially concerned about such characteristics of tires as rolling resistance and are trying to reduce it while preventing the deterioration of others. performance characteristics... At the same time, experts remind that in order for tires to really reduce fuel consumption, it is necessary to regularly monitor the pressure level.
- There were no so-called "green" tires among the test participants. The most economical were expensive tires Dunlop, and here is the installation tire sava or Kormoran can significantly increase fuel costs.
Introducing the top of the best summer tires 2019 for small and medium passenger cars. It includes budget, mid and premium tires, which are available in sizes from R13 to R16. When compiling the rating, the cost of tires, the relevance of the model and its results in tests were taken into account.
All models are sorted and presented by value from expensive to cheaper.
Segment: premium.
Multiple participant and test winner from European and domestic magazines. It is a balanced, soft, comfortable and quiet tire that performs equally well on dry and wet asphalt. Ideal for both leisurely city driving and country trips.
Country of origin: France, Portugal, Czech Republic, Germany, Romania.
2.
Segment: premium.
The company positions the model as a “tough weather tire” that is highly resistant to aquaplaning, fuel efficiency and increased durability. It will show its best qualities on wet asphalt, although its behavior on dry surfaces is also predictable and safe. When buying a tire from an authorized dealer, it is covered by an extended warranty, which is an added benefit.
Country of origin: Russia, Finland.
3.
Segment: premium.
A quiet, comfortable and economical tire that delivers equally effective braking and handling on both wet and dry asphalt. Thanks to the most balanced characteristics, in 2016 the tire took first place in the test from the Swedish edition Teknikens Varld.
Country of origin: Slovenia, Poland, Germany, France.
4.
Segment: premium.
The company markets the model as a "travel tire" that strikes a great balance between safety, handling and comfort. During the development of the model, special emphasis was placed on an increased level of comfort: on the tire tread there are many specially shaped grooves that reduce the level of vibration and noise in the cabin. Perfect for long distance travel at high speed and quiet city driving.
Country of origin: Japan, Hungary, Poland.
5.
Segment: premium.
Balanced summer tire from the Italian manufacturer Pirelli, which brakes equally effectively and provides a high level of handling on wet and dry asphalt. The tire took first place in the test from the Russian magazine "Za Rulem", which was held in 2017.
Country of origin: Italy, Russia, Turkey.
6.
Segment: medium.
A very balanced tire from a South Korean manufacturer that performs well on dry and wet asphalt and also provides high fuel efficiency... And although the tire is in the mid-range, in most tests it is not much inferior in performance to the premium models. Great option for the city and long-distance trips for reasonable money.
Country of origin: Korea, Hungary, China.
7.
Segment: medium.
The budget variant of the premium Nokian Hakka Green 2. The tire delivers balanced average performance on dry and wet asphalt, without significantly lagging behind the premium models. A good option for those who want to drive safely around the city in any weather without overpaying for an extended warranty.
Country of origin: Russia.
8.
Segment: medium.
Quiet, comfortable and balanced UHP tire with a sporty character from the Dutch company Vredestein. In tests, the tire demonstrates good fuel economy and average results on dry and wet asphalt. Suitable for the city and long trips.
Country of origin: Holland.
9.
Segment: medium.
Summer "rain tire" with an asymmetric tread pattern that provides a safe ride on wet asphalt, low level noise and excellent ride. On dry pavement, the tire behaves a little worse, so it is more suitable for rainy regions.
Country of origin: France, Germany, Romania, Portugal. The Uniroyal company belongs to the German concern Continental.
10.
Segment: medium.
The reverse alternative for Uniroyal is a comfortable, economical and durable tire from a South Korean manufacturer that reveals its best qualities on dry asphalt, but lags behind on wet. A good inexpensive option for the southern regions.
Country of origin: Korea.
11.
Segment: medium.
Initially, the model was created as a comfort class and was called Kumho Solus HS51. However, in operation, it showed good sporting qualities, so in 2015 it was transferred to the Ecsta line (sports tire series), maintaining a balance between dynamic qualities and comfort.
In tests, the tire demonstrates excellent aquaplaning resistance and a balanced average performance on dry and wet asphalt.
Country of origin: Korea.
12.
Segment: medium.
Summer fuel-efficient tire from the Fulda company, which is part of the German concern Goodyear. In tests, the tire shows a balanced average performance on both wet and dry asphalt, high fuel efficiency and good comfort levels. At a low cost, it is perfect for daily city trips.
Country of origin: France, Germany, Poland, Slovenia, Turkey, Thailand
13.
Segment: medium / budget.
A fuel-efficient summer tire with a symmetrical non-directional tread pattern. In tests for braking and handling, the tire does not show outstanding results even against the background of budget tires, but its main advantages are a high level of comfort and low fuel consumption. At a low cost - a good choice for daily use within the city.
Country of origin: Malaysia, Japan
14.
Segment: medium / budget.
Another tire strengths which is comfort while driving: it is soft, quiet, perfectly absorbs any road bumps and consumes little fuel. In tests on dry and wet asphalt, the tire demonstrates below average braking and handling.
Country of origin: Romania, Germany, Czech Republic, France.
15.
Segment: medium / budget.
A fuel-efficient tire from a Korean manufacturer with average performance on dry and wet asphalt without clear advantages and disadvantages. Like the previous two models, the tire offers low fuel consumption and a quiet and comfortable ride. A good option for little money.
Country of origin: China.
16.
Segment: budget.
Another fuel-efficient budget bus with an asymmetric tread pattern that provides a high level of comfort and average performance in driving safety disciplines.
Country of origin: Slovakia, Slovenia, Russia.
17.
Segment: budget.
A summer budget tire with an average level of comfort, noise and good braking qualities and manageability. The tire is notable for the fact that the Taurus company belongs to the French Michelin and all its products comply with high standards quality, keeping the cost at the level of Chinese or domestic rubber.
Also, this model is produced under the brands Tigar, Kormoran, Strial, Orium, Riken.
Country of origin: Serbia.
18.
