Crossovers are gaining popularity every year. In this article, we will consider which is better: Nissan X-Trail or Mitsubishi Outlander. Both Japanese companies are giants in the car market, and the rivalry between these models has been going on for over 15 years.
First Nissan x trail was released in 2000 and Mitsubishi outlander- in 2001. Over the years, several modifications have been made to each model. In 2014-2015. new versions of the crossovers loved by customers have appeared on the Russian market. Nissan produced completely new car, and Mitsubishi updated the already existing third generation of the crossover family.
Let's compare the last generations of both legends and find out which one is better.
Prices and configuration
The first thing a potential buyer looks at when choosing a car is its price tag. According to this parameter, the picture looks very interesting! At the time of release updated versions in 2015, Outlander clearly won in value. The price tag of its latest version with a 2.4 liter engine. in the maximum configuration was 1,820,000 rubles, and the opponent's, also with full stuffing and a 2.5 liter engine, cost 1,895,000 rubles. The difference is obvious, and the victory was clearly in Mitsubishi's favor.
But a couple of years have passed and the price situation has changed radically. According to sites official dealers the new Nissan in the maximum configuration costs 1,847,000 rubles, and the Outlander - 1,999,990 rubles. Moreover, this is the price tag of the 2016 model. Crossover with a 2.4 liter engine. and a power of 167 hp. lineup 2017 costs 2 109 990 rubles. This is a colossal difference, and in this comparison criterion X Trail confidently comes out ahead. Drastic change in cost is understandable, and its reason will be disclosed below.
Engines
Speaking of trim levels, Nissan offers its customers three types of engine:
- 1.6 l. with a capacity of 130 hp;
- 2.0 l. 144 hp;
- 2.5 l. with a capacity of 171 hp.
On versions with a 1.6 liter engine, a 6-speed mechanical box gear. The rest of the modifications are equipped with the familiar "Nissan" CVT.
In terms of equipment, the rival's situation is poorer. The car is represented exclusively by a variator gearbox and 2 types of motors:
- 2.0 l. with a capacity of 146 hp;
- 2.4 l. with 167 "horses".
And according to this criterion, X-Trail again comes out ahead, since it presents to the buyer more options, more powerful motor, but at the same time for less money.
Salon
In order not to violate the tradition of reviews, let's start comparing the salons with the trunk - this element is one of the main ones when choosing this type of car. And here again the dilemma arises. Comparing the latest configurations - Nissan X Trail 2.5 liters. and Mitsubishi outlander 2.4 l. - the useful volume of the first is 497 liters. against 477 liters. at the second.
But if you fold the rear seats, the situation changes - 1585 hp. at Nissan against 1640 hp. at Mitsubishi.
And if we take for comparison the 2-liter version of Mitsubishi, its Japanese competitor is completely on the shoulder blades. The useful volume of the trunk of this modification is 591/1754 liters, which is an incredibly "roomy" figure among classmates.
However, this is a small inconvenience. The Outlander's large boot space is provided by the spare wheel, which is located under the floor, and not in the cabin, as in the Nissan X-Trail. In the conditions of Russian roads, this can create serious difficulties, since the "spare wheel" will constantly encounter the effects of dirt, moisture, and in winter icicles will hang on it. Therefore, it is better to pierce the wheels on a dry asphalt road in the warm season, otherwise you risk plunging into the hard working days of a trucker.
By the way, it should be said that both opponents have an electric tailgate.
There is ample space for passengers in both crossovers, front and rear. In Nissan, there is even a little more of it. But due to the panoramic roof in more expensive trim levels, there is almost enough space above the head of passengers in the second row. This is due to the fact that the roof opening and closing mechanism is hidden under the headliner.
The defect is insignificant, but psychologically this fact will press for a certain time. A person of any height can fit in Mitsubishi Outlander.
The ergonomics of the driver's seat are extremely similar. Everything is in its place, easily accessible and unobtrusive. It is worth noting a number of subtleties that can be considered a matter of taste. For example, the on-board computer in Outlander is more complicated, and the menu colors make the eyes strain more, which is rather uncomfortable while driving. Interestingly, the computer control button is located almost on dashboard... But Mitsubishi has paddle shifters.
In general, the Mitsubishi salon looks more sporty and bold. The same can be seen in the driving style. Nissan in this case is more of a family car, where comfort, safety and smoothness are taken as the basis. It benefits from a panoramic roof that the Outlander manufacturers cannot provide. But overall, the ergonomics and interior design of both crossovers are equally good. Considering that the volume of the trunk is in favor of one Japanese, and the number of small but pleasant options is in favor of the second, we have a draw in this round. By the way, the noise insulation in the models is also at the same level.
Technical equipment
Let's move on to the next criterion, which is one of the most important - this is optionality. And here you will understand how that colossal Mitsubishi price gap mentioned earlier came about.
In 2015, when new versions of both crossovers entered the markets, Nissan was a solid winner. If we compare the maximum configurations of cars, then the X-Trail also had an all-round view system, which allows you to see all objects around the car's perimeter through the on-board computer, and a system that warns of crossing your path of a foreign object when reversing.
It also has sensors that signal when the wheels of the car cross a solid line, a system that notifies the vehicle in the blind zone, as well as a system automatic switching headlights from near to far. All this was not in the early version of the restyled Outlander. In the complete set 2016-2017 many of these options appeared, including all-round visibility and automatic headlight switching system. But I had to pay extra for the options - hence the jump in price.
Both machines have intelligent four-wheel drive and an uphill stop system that automatically locks the wheels and allows you to safely climb uphill without slipping.
Controllability and cross-country ability
During Toyota Rav 4 vs Nissan X Trail comparisons we said that "Rafik" is calmer and smoother, while the X Trail is faster and more aggressive. In this review of models, the situation is reversed. Compared to the Mitsubishi Outlander, the Nissan is calmer and more measured, and its opponent is impudent.
"Sportiness" Outlander can be traced in everything: from interior design to driving style. This is facilitated by wheel which is slightly "rubbery". It doesn't have the same responsiveness and rigidity as the competitor. Due to this, while driving a Mitsubishi, you have to constantly catch the balance. Every now and then he tries to get away, throwing adrenaline, like firewood in a stove.
This driving style stimulates, recharges, allows you to feel the drive, but the driver gets tired quickly from constant control. Outlander has a weak steering return, which makes it difficult to feel the car properly. Whereas in Nissan the driver drives the car using vision and feeling the car through steering feedback, Mitsubishi has to rely solely on vision. Unless you are a young ambitious guy trying to tame an obstinate stallion, this will quickly become annoying!
Against its background, the X-Trail seems too smooth, even, or even too correct. This can be seen in a calm and confident driving in any corner. This crossover exudes safety and stability. As a family car, it is ideal! Here you can take a break from the bustle of the city and enjoy a comfortable and confident ride.
Both CVTs are good when it comes to gearboxes, but the Outlander is better tuned. It seems to have artificial intelligence, which ensures a comfortable ride for the driver and protects the structure of the transmission. For example, if you try to switch to manual mode and engage a lower gear at a speed of 100 km / h, the box will not let you. It seems to protect you from rash actions that could harm the transmission. In addition, when the speed is lowered, the gearbox often engages the lower gear itself, providing headroom during acceleration.
As for the transmission, the score goes towards the Outlander, and the cross-country ability is the "ridge" of the X-Trail. Its intelligent four-wheel drive is better tuned. This allows him to slowly but surely take almost any height, and not take it with a swoop with speed, but smoothly and slowly. The opponent, in turn, lags behind a little, but keeps the bar. Even superiority in ground clearance does not help to win. Ground clearance Mitsubishi leaves 215 mm against 210 from the opponent.
Interestingly, recently, crossovers have begun to be produced with a fairly stiff suspension, which allows passengers to feel all the features of our luxury roads... But the models presented in this review are examples of softness! The Outlander, in its usual rocking motion, neatly absorbs all irregularities and stands guard for the comfort of passengers. And the X-Trail completely swallows any terrain, and at any speed. And again on the score in both piggy banks!
Japanese vs Japanese: summing up
The cars featured in our review are similar, but at the same time very different. They are similar in terms of interior and comfort. Considering the latest modifications of 2016-2017, they are almost equally equipped technically, have similar engine characteristics and an equally comfortable suspension. Outlander clearly wins in terms of trunk volume and CVT operation, and the X-Trail captivates with the number of modifications and cross-country ability. And his price tag, along with all the technical equipment, is an order of magnitude lower.
"And still! What to buy? " - you ask. It depends on the character. X-Trail exudes stability and safety. The crossover is perfect for calm, balanced family people who have already proved everything to everyone in this life. It can be compared to pantyhose - it is thin and practical, while Outlander is a pair of stockings! He is playful, aggressive, makes him always keep his finger on the pulse and be ready to maneuver. It awakens drive! And if you have a lot of it in you, and you are not afraid to waste it, this car For you! But in recent years, the price tag has been biting heavily on it, which scares off the "lion's share" of buyers. Therefore, it is worth weighing all the nuances and choosing a suitable unit. The main thing is that the ride is a pleasure!
The choice of the machine should be approached responsibly. Many city dwellers choose to become crossover owners. Today, two models of cars are popular among Russians. Nissan qashqai and Mitsubishi ASX... To understand which car to choose, it is worth considering the technical parameters, the design of the two brands, and read the reviews of the owners.
This is a compact crossover car that has been on sale since 2006. The manufacturer is the Japanese company Nissan. This is the first computer designed model. Vehicle combines the features of an SUV and a hatchback. Suitable for driving on tight city streets. It is characterized by reliability and endurance.
Technical specifications:
- Length - 437.7 cm.
- Height - 159 cm.
- Width - 183.7 cm.
- The wheelbase is 264.6 cm.
- Clearance - 20 cm.
- Weight - 1373 kg.
- Trunk volume - 430 liters.
- Volume fuel tank- 60 liters.
The basic version includes six airbags, an audio system, anti-lock braking system, air conditioning, power accessories with heated seats. The improved version has alloy wheels, climate control system, variator. The price of the car reaches on average 950,000 - 1,460,000 rubles.
Advantages:
- Elegant look.
- Comfortable driver and passenger seats.
- Good visibility.
- High performance characteristics.
- Large luggage compartment.
- High ground clearance.
- Cozy salon.
- Easy management.
- Good maneuverability.
- The possibility of transforming the cabin.
- High quality braking system.
- High degree of security.
Disadvantages:
- Creaks in the luggage compartment.
- Frequent interruptions in the operation of the rain sensor.
- High oil consumption.
- High price of spare parts.
- Frequent problems with headlight washers.
- Expensive service.
Mitsubishi ASX
This is a small crossover that went on sale in 2010. Has characteristics sports car... It is a competitor to Qashqai.
Technical specifications:
- Length - 429.5 cm.
- Height - 161.5 cm.
- Width - 177 cm.
- The wheelbase is 267 cm.
- Clearance - 19.5 cm.
- Weight - 1455 kg.
- Trunk volume - 415 liters.
- The volume of the fuel tank is 60 liters.
The basic equipment is represented by two airbags, air conditioning, electric windows, driver's seat height adjustment system, steering column, heated mirrors, remote control central locking... The improved version also has anti-lock braking system brakes, aluminum wheel disks, branded parking sensors.
The cost of a new car in showrooms varies within from 770,000 to 1,480,000 rubles.
Advantages:
- Good ground clearance.
- Small turning radius.
- Bright design.
- Full size spare wheel.
- Good handling.
- Reliability on the road.
- Three versions of the gasoline engine.
- Spacious and comfortable interior.
- Moderate fuel consumption.
- Discreet style.
- Reliable and durable suspension.
Disadvantages:
- Poor insulation.
- Frequent knock problems.
- Weak shock absorbers.
- Few compartments in the cabin for storing small items.
- Low thrust.
- Problems with replacing some parts.
Common features of the two brands
General points:
- Roughly the same price range.
- Similar equipment.
- Nice design.
- Similar technical parameters.
- Same transmission (CVT or mechanical).
- Rear seats of the same shape and comfort. The presence of central armrests.
- Reliable braking system.
- The presence of a large number of additional functions.
- Spacious salon.
- Sophisticated ergonomics.
- Low energy intensity to overcome major obstacles.
Difference
Differences between Qashqai and Mitsubishi ASX:
- More responsive brakes.
- The engine runs quieter.
- The car moves less smoothly.
- The unevenness of the roadway passes worse.
- Stricter and more expensive design.
- It weighs less.
- Worse suspension. Mitsubishi ASX has more durable and cheaper suspension assemblies.
- More trunk volume.
- Better and more reliable electronics.
- Better handling due to stiffer suspension.
- Less oil consumption.
- The variator works worse, often breaks down.
- The car is more expensive to maintain.
- More reliable and durable paintwork resistant to weathering. Mitsubishi ASX has hard plastic and starts to creak in frosty weather.
- The difference is in the appearance of the salons.
Which car is the best?
At first glance, both models seem to be of equal technical parameters and external performance. In fact, they have some differences.
According to reviews of motorists and auto repairmen in terms of technical characteristics, equipment and quality better nissan Qashqai. At the same time, the car with an improved configuration of this brand is slightly cheaper than the Mitsubishi ASX.
If in the first place is appearance, style, want to buy an eccentric and spacious car, then it is worth buying a Mitsubishi ASX. If the power and reliability of driving on city streets is more important, then it is better to take the Nissan Qashqai. If you want to save money on car maintenance, you should give preference to a Mitsubishi ASX car.
In the process of this comparison, we will determine which is better: Nissan Qashqai or Mitsubishi ASX. Both cars are worthy of our attention, as Nissan introduced the second generation of its brainchild, and Mitsubishi returned to Russian market after 2 years of absence. In addition, the price range of both cars is about the same. Compare Japanese quality two rivals in the class and find out what to choose.
About models
At the end of 2006, Russian buyers saw the Qashqai compact crossover for the first time. Many still argue about whether the model is an SUV or an all-wheel drive hatchback. The first generation had some complaints from drivers, but the car gained popularity.
After 8 years, the second generation of the crossover was released in Russia, which took into account the mistakes of previous modifications. The car was received positively and named one of the leaders in the compact SUV class.
In 2017, the car received a corporate restyling. But, as usual, the model has not yet reached Russia. In car dealerships they sell a model in the back of 2014.
One of the competitors of Qashqai 2 was Mitsubishi ASX, which has been produced since 2010. Over the eight-year history, the car has gone through more than one restyling, but the car has not received significant changes. In fact, we have before us the first generation of a crossover with a redesigned design.
In 2015, a plant in the United States, which produced ASX specifically for Russia, closed. Accordingly, sales of the crossover in our country have stopped. But in 2017 Japanese company decided to resume sales in order to expand the market.
However, she did not offer customers anything new, except for an improved design. Is this Mitsubishi ASX enough to outperform its Japanese rival?
Outside
The second generation of Qashqai has seriously changed both in size and design. He became shorter, longer and wider than his older brother. The rounded headlights that had given the image of a good friend were gone. They were replaced by tapered LED lights rising to the wings, completely changing the perception of the car.
In the center is a massive chrome V-shaped trim that wraps around the Nissan logo. Due to this, the car is perceived in a completely different way. An uncompromising and high-performance crossover that makes it clear that its status is one level higher in comparison with the previous generation.
The exterior is quite similar to the X-Trail of the same lineup, only smaller. The lines are sharper and longer, which makes the car visually lower and sportier. This is typical for almost all cars of the last 5 years. Optionally, in the maximum configuration, the manufacturer offers 19-inch alloy wheels with an exclusive design.
Mitsubishi ASX tries to keep up with the exterior design level. Seeing the front end of the car catches the eye with the familiar X-shaped styling. It is expressed in chrome inserts running from the headlights to the bumper. These elements are reminiscent of the Pajero Sport style.
The headlights and bumpers underwent minor changes, and the profile relief was modernized. But in general, ASH is very similar to itself 8 years ago. It is built on the same platform and has the same problems.
If you compare the design of both models, the Mitsubishi ASX is an obsolete car. He does not offer anything new to his customers, but exploits the once created image, adding stylish details to it. In this regard, this crossover resembles Niva - the years go by, but it remains unchanged! The designers of Nissan Qashqai 2017 have definitely won the battle for the best appearance, and we are waiting for the new generation of Mitsubishi ASX, believing that the company will still decide to upgrade its "worn out" model.
What is inside?
The interior in Nissan Qashqai has been seriously improved over the previous generation. The manufacturer began to use materials best quality, increased the level of comfort and ergonomics. But the design of the front panel and the location of the control buttons were borrowed from the Nissan X-Trail.
What is the difference between X-Trail and Kashkai - you ask? Paradoxically, the difference is in comfort, ergonomics and quality of finishing materials. According to these indicators, the 2016-2017 Nissan Qashqai bypasses its ancestor by a head, but is inferior to a larger relative.
The instrument panel is presented in the form of two large and easy-to-read dials with a compact on-board computer in the middle. The steering wheel and gear lever are absolutely identical to the X-Trail. The front seats are comfortable and have several adjustment modes. In the more expensive versions, the customer gets 6-way electric seat adjustment.
The interior design looks modern, simple and tasteful. Nothing extra. All elements fit well into the overall style and are in place. In the cabin of the new Qashqai, the driver feels more solid than in the model of the previous generation.
The interior of the Mitsubishi ASX 2017 remained rough, but understandable. The control buttons for various functions are intuitive, but the development of the interior of ten years ago makes itself felt. The central display is meager in terms of functions and does not spoil the clarity of graphics. The speed of the computer is also lame.
The only noticeable change in the interior of the restyled version is the change in the location of the cup holder and the drive control button. But this change is more likely a disadvantage, since the adjustment tool all-wheel drive removed by the gearshift lever. When he was at the armrest, it was easier to operate.
In the second row, cars perform in the same way. End-to-end legroom. Passengers taller than 190 cm will have to struggle to find knee room.
The ceiling does not press, and in Qashqai there is a panoramic roof at all, visually expanding the interior of the car.
Compared to the previous generation Nissan, the new crossover has more legroom. But the space was freed up due to the almost vertical landing on the sofa, which is extremely inconvenient on long trips.
The volume of the trunk is about the same: 430 liters. vs 400 hp Qashqai is slightly ahead.
Now about the technical equipment. If Qashqai is keeping pace with progress, implementing the same set of safety systems as in the X-Trail, then ACX 2017 marketers seem to believe that the car will happily buy because of the heated steering wheel and cruise control. It is regrettable, but even the latest Mitsubishi equipment does not have parking sensors or traffic control in the lane. The most you can count on are light and rain sensors, a descent assist system, a single rear-view camera and a keyless entry system.
In addition to the aforementioned options, the Nissan Qashqai has a blind spot monitoring system, a 360⁰ all-round visibility system, a lane departure warning system and even an intelligent parking assistant. Next to him, the ACH cannot be compared.
The Mitsubishi Outlander is different. Restyling was performed, and now the car does not have a large radiator grille and aggressive headlights, the sharp broken edges of the body have sunk into oblivion. Now, in the stream of cars, he looks like such a respectable father of a family. Powerful, good-natured, but fat from a quiet life. Although this is only an illusion. The dimensions of the car remained the same. And some roundness, and as a result, improved aerodynamics, was only beneficial - noise decreased, appetite became more modest.
Let's go to the salon
Nissan designers did their best. The quality of materials, compared to the previous modification, has clearly improved. Navigation and multimedia units are now located in the center console. The screen is very informative, which is freely located between the speedometer and tachometer. It even reflects the scheme of the distribution of thrust between the axles. Ergonomics on top. And, yes, and much more, you can directly from the steering wheel. It is both convenient and there is no need to be distracted from the road. By the way, the radio tape recorder has acquired an advanced seven-inch screen.
Nissan Qashqai is equipped with... It includes as many as seven systems. Here's just how it will all work in Russia - big question... Our markings are often missing or applied incorrectly, and no monitoring of blind spots will save you from a major or an insolent "statesman". Although, let it be, it may still come in handy.
Future Nissan owners Qashqai will surely appreciate the transparent roof. Not everyone likes hatches, so this decision can only be welcomed. The seats are comfortable, lateral support is normal. The range of adjustments is also not satisfactory. Nissan designers - you are great! When choosing a Nissan Qashqai or Mitsubishi Outlander, your efforts will undoubtedly be appreciated.
The internal content of the Mitsubishi Outlander is fully consistent. No fun colors, no glamor. The dark leather interior looks even a little gloomy. But solid! You can't take that away. The front lacquered panel is downright an example of laconicism. A scattering of buttons completely replaces the multifunctional screen, only the emergency gang is placed on a separate toggle switch. Though electronic systems here is no less than in a car from Nissan. Severity is the leitmotif of the Mitsubishi Outlander interior.
Adjustment range front seat will be enough even for a basketball player. The steering wheel is now adjustable in both height and reach. What the Mitsubishi Outlander has in abundance is space. It is convenient not only for the driver, passengers in the back row of seats will also not feel like poor relatives. Large trunk, coupled with a convenient folding system rear seats, will allow. Mitsubishi engineers have made a great all-round vehicle.
Power units and transmission
There are three engines available for the Nissan Qashqai. The most "groovy" of them is a 115-horsepower turbocharged engine with a volume of 1.2 liters. The two-liter version is familiar to many from Renault models and is nothing special. Since this Nissan model is actively sold in Europe, there is also a diesel power unit... It produces 130 "horses" at 1.6 liters of volume. , then you have to choose between a six-speed manual transmission and a variator.
| Car model: | Nissan qashqai | Mitsubishi outlander |
| Manufacturer country: | Japan (made in UK) | Japan |
| Body type: | SUV | SUV |
| Number of places: | 5 | 5 |
| Number of doors: | 5 | 5 |
| Engine displacement, cubic meters cm: | 1997 | 1998 |
| Power, hp with. / about. min .: | 141/6000 | 147/6000 |
| Maximum speed, km / h: | 180 | 180 |
| Acceleration to 100 km / h, s: | 11,7 | 12,3 |
| Type of drive: | full | full |
| Checkpoint: | variable speed drive | variable speed drive |
| Fuel type: | AI-95 gasoline | AI-95 gasoline |
| Consumption per 100 km: | city 10.7; highway 6.8; mixed cycle 8.2 | city 10.6; highway 7.0, mixed 8.3 |
| Length, mm: | 4541 | 4665 |
| Width, mm: | 1780 | 1800 |
| Height, mm: | 1644 | 1680 |
| Clearance, mm: | 200 | 215 |
| Tire size: | 215 / 60R17 | 215/70 R16 |
| Curb weight, kg: | 1650 | 1569 |
| Full weight, kg: | 2215 | 2070 |
| Fuel tank volume: | 65 | 60 |
Mitsubishi Outlander is equipped with more powerful ones. The weakest of them gives out "on the mountain" 146 Horse power(volume 2 liters). Fans of "what is more powerful" are available a 2.4-liter engine (167 hp). But choosing a gearbox will not work - only a variator. Power is a good argument in the debate about which is better - Qashqai or Outlander.
Driving qualities
Still, the Qashqai is more of a city car. Here he is good. The new generation variator allows you to keep up with other cars at traffic lights, easily "swallow" road irregularities. However, Nissan showed itself quite well on the track. The perfectly tuned helps him in this. But as for the off-road ... Of course, it will reach the dacha along the Qashqai country road, but that's all. Although no one demands more from him. After all, this is a "SUV", not a full-fledged SUV.
Mitsubishi Outlander is in no way lagging behind a competitor. Well tuned steering confidently holds the road, the modernized (and reinforced) suspension is not afraid of bumps and bumps. But according to off-road qualities Outlander is clearly ahead of Qashqai, and the wealth of drive adjustments is also evident.
So, Nissan Qashqai is different:
- good looks;
- cheerful modern salon;
- good choice of engines;
- modernized variator.
Test Drive car nissan Qashqai:
And the Mitsubishi Outlander boasts:
- strict lines of the body;
- laconic, but;
- powerful engines;
- good off-road capabilities.
Test Drive Mitsubishi car Outlander:
Let's sum up
Our task was not only to compare Outlander and Qashqai, but also to help potential buyers in choosing one of them. Both models proved to be very worthy. Both cars would be a good buy. However, in our opinion, Nissan is more suitable for active young citizens (or women). And respectable, businesslike men with an economic streak are Mitsubishi's clients.
