Selection of summer tires for crossovers. Comparison of summer tires for crossovers. The best tires in the middle price segment

From year to year, crossovers are gaining momentum on Russian market, and, despite the crisis situation, cars of this class are in stable demand. And a separate question in this case is the topic of tires, because they must behave well not only on the asphalt surface, but also outside it. That is why it is necessary to test such tires according to an expanded program, including off-road disciplines.

The test participants were summer tires with the dimension 235/65 R17, which are suitable for almost all off-road vehicles of the mid-size segment, and the so-called asphalt specification H / T (or HT). Indeed, it is these tires that occupy over 80% of the Russian market for "footwear" for crossovers, and the remaining share falls on mud (M / T or MT) and universal (A / T or AT) tires for SUVs.

In total, eight sets of tires from famous brands were tested, and among them were the five market leaders represented by Bridgestone Dueler H / P Sport, Continental ContiCrossContact UHP, Michelin Latitude Tour HP, Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV and Pirelli Scorpion Verde. In addition, Nokian Hakka Blue SUV and Yokohama Geolandar SUV G055 tires manufactured in Russia, and a representative of the fast-growing South Korean company Hankook, Dynapro HP2 tires, were tested.

For crossover tires, in addition to asphalt disciplines, light off-road tests and longitudinal aquaplaning were prepared. Of course, on serious off-road, HT tires are completely helpless, well, after all, crossover owners periodically have to drive on wet grass, sand, gravel or dirt roads. As the main carrier of the "shoe" was one of the mid-size off-road vehicles.

The first exercise that touched the test participants was the assessment of the tire for rolling resistance, which was carried out using special expensive equipment (it not only speeds up the process, but also gives a smaller measurement error). During the tests, passed at speeds of 60 and 90 km / h, a downforce not exceeding 80% of the permissible pressure presses on the wheel rolling on the treadmill (the load index 104 was taken as a reference point, which means the maximum weight of 900 kg).
For more accurate results, the stands were visited by two tires of each model, and the lowest rolling resistance and, therefore, the lowest fuel consumption were shown by Yokohama and Michelin, but Hankook tires became an outsider in this discipline.

The next discipline is aquaplaning on a straight section, and the tire carrier in this case was a mid-size pickup truck, the transmission of which was forcibly activated in rear-wheel drive mode. The measurement site, which should be approached in third gear at a speed of 60 km / h, is represented by a bath 200 meters long with an 8 mm layer of water, while the right wheels remain on dry asphalt. Gauges, using individual wheel sensors, record the difference in the angular speeds of the right and left front wheels, and the 15% difference between the angular speeds of the right wheel in contact with the asphalt and the slipping left wheel that floats over the road is taken as the start of aquaplaning.
The palm in this test went to Pirelli tires with a score of 92.6 km / h, while Goodyear and Hankook performed slightly worse - 91.9 km / h and 91.5 km / h, respectively. Lagging behind are Michelin, which float at 87.2 km / h, and Continental, with 87.6 km / h.

Well, having worked with the equipment, it's time to go directly to running tests, and at an optimal ambient temperature of 27 degrees Celsius, on two cars at once - on a crossover and on a pickup truck. To assess directional stability on the high-speed ring, a five-door is better suited - in this discipline, all the nuances of the car's behavior during soft lane changes from lane to lane and adjusting the direction of travel are determined, how simple and clear it is to operate, and the steering information and steering angles are also assessed. And of course, it does not stand aside and checking the level of internal noise and smoothness of the course by means of a special section with various irregularities.
The best directional stability was shown by Nokian tires, which provided the crossover with the most informative and dense steering wheel and excellent reactions during maneuvers. But at the opposite end of the rating in this exercise were Bridgestone - when driving, they turn almost without resistance, which at speed can play a cruel joke, but on a straight line they endow the "steering wheel" with emptiness and low information content. Michelin tires turned out to be preferable in terms of comfort, and only Hankook can keep up with them in low speed.

Well, now it's time to move on to "wet" testing - braking on asphalt, which is covered with a 1.5 mm layer of water. It is carried out according to the same technique that is used for passenger cars- measurements begin at 80 km / h and end at 5 km / h in order to exclude the interference of the anti-lock braking system. It is worth noting that the braking test was carried out on two different surfaces - on asphalt with an average coefficient of adhesion (approximately as on Russian roads) and on a smooth surface.
The results were very interesting. In the first case, the leadership was taken by Goodyear tires with an indicator of 33.5 meters, ahead of Continental by almost half a meter (33.9 meters), and in the second case, Continental (24.2 meters) showed the best figures, which left behind Nokian, Hankook and Goodyear. Outsiders on each surface were Michelin tires (46.6 and 28.1 meters, respectively) and Yokohama (48.6 and 31.4 meters).

The next test is a "wet" changeover, that is, a lane change on a 12-meter section with a strip width of 3.5 meters. "Ahead of the rest of the world" here were Nokian tires, on which the crossover gained the highest speed of 67.2 km / h. Hankook tires proved to be on the good side, losing only 0.1 km / h to the leader, while Michelin got the bronze with a result of 61.4 km / h.
But do not forget that the maximum speed of passage of the rearrangement does not yet reflect the whole picture, because the amount of effort spent by the driver on this exercise is no less important, which is why the controllability when changing lanes is also assessed in parallel. And here, four tires at once - Goodyear, Continental, Nokian and Pirelli - earned the highest points for reactions and behavior during extreme maneuvering.

It so happened that the "wet" shift was carried out on asphalt with a high coefficient of adhesion, and the "dry" exercise had to be carried out on a more slippery, albeit dry, surface, which is why the maximum speeds on a wet road turned out to be higher than on a dry one. That is why one more test was added - the controllability check on a special track (however, the estimates here turned out to be almost the same as for the rearrangement). Nokian tires performed better than others due to their well-predictable sliding behavior and immediate steering responses. Continental and Pirelli showed the highest stability in terms of handling, earning the same points in both of the exercises.

Having finished the cycle of "wet" tests, we proceed to "dry" disciplines, which began with braking from a speed of 100 to 5 km / h on a rough and smooth surface. The crossover, which was shod in Continental tires, braked faster than the others in both cases - 38.8 and 39.2 meters, respectively. The last position was again occupied by Yokohama (43.2 and 45.8).

"Dry" conversion was carried out under the same conditions as "wet", but with only one difference - dry asphalt. But it is worth recalling that the coefficient of adhesion on this surface is less than on a wet area, which is why the speeds were slightly lower. With an indicator of 65.3 km / h, Hankook entered the "dry" leaders, and lost to all Bridgestone (60.6 km / h). In terms of handling, Nokian tires performed well, with Yokohama being the underdog.

In handling on a special track, Pirelli tires scored more points than others - a mid-size crossover with such wheels showed better reactions and behavior on the road. The most interesting thing is that all the subjects received stable results. Bridgestone earned the gold medal for stability of handling - only these tires got the same numbers in different modes.

In parallel with the asphalt tests, an off-road test was carried out on a mid-size pickup - in these exercises, a two-wheel drive car was needed (with the deactivation mode of one of the axles), which allows you to more correctly catch the difference between the tires. Speed ​​sensors were installed on each of the wheels of the "truck", but the acceleration sensor was not without.

The first discipline is the assessment of traction on wet grass, along which the pickup drives in first gear at a speed of 5-8 km / h, after which it accelerates until the wheel slip reaches 70% (this process is controlled by a special device, and the acceleration measures the sensor). The traction force is obtained by multiplying the acceleration by the mass of the car, and a special program shows a graph of the dependence of the traction force on the amount of wheel slip.
When summarizing the results, information was used, limited by two points - the initial 15 percent and the final 69 percent slip (each of the subjects was able to achieve such an indicator), between which the average value of the traction force was determined.
To make the results as reliable as possible, on each tire model, the tires were accelerated twenty-five times, while the reference (base) "rubber" was used to track changes in the road surface during the test, because the grip on the grass is very unstable.
Yokohama tires excelled in this exercise with a traction force of 430 N, and the worst were Pirelli (385 N).

The determination of traction on a gravel road is carried out according to the same method as in the previous test, and the differences are only in the gravel under the wheels and a different measurement range: from 15 to 75 percent slippage.
The first place on the podium went to the Continental tires (443 H traction), while Yokohama and Bridgestone (399 H and 398 H respectively) were the "weakest", showing traction 5% below the average in the test.

The most difficult discipline is checking traction on wet sand, as it requires meticulous preparation - the sand should be filled with water and tamped using heavy equipment. It is carried out according to the following method - the pickup is attached by means of a rigid coupling to the truck and tries to move it from its place. Of course, it is impossible to move such a "trailer" on the sand for a pickup truck, but the dynamometer built into the hitch allows you to determine the traction force: the device turns on in seconds after the clutch is fully engaged, then takes measurements for a second and then deactivates.
For the result to be reliable, all sets of tires undergo twenty measurements, each time shifting one meter forward along the diagonal of the prepared site.
The most "powerful" tires in this discipline were the Continental tires with an indicator of 494 H, and the modest ones were Bridgestone (424 H), deviating at once by 8% from the average.

Many car enthusiasts choose their tires based on test results from manufacturers or independent experts. We studied the test results of various brands of tires and made our own rating of summer tires for crossovers.

1. Rolling resistance. The measurement of this parameter is carried out at the appropriate stand. The test tire is mounted on a test wheel that rolls on a running drum with downforce applied to the wheel. The rubber with the lowest rolling resistance provides the lowest fuel consumption and saves money.
2. Aquaplaning. This parameter affects the handling of the car on a wet road surface. The moisture remaining in the tire grooves affects the stability of the vehicle. The measurements are carried out using special sensors that record the difference in the angular velocities of the vehicle wheels. Measurements are taken on dry and wet asphalt and the degree of slippage is calculated.
3. Course stability. This indicator is very important for SUVs, the car should not lose control when entering turns, changing lanes from one lane to another, and so on.
4. Noise level. When in contact with the road surface, tires make a certain noise, the lower it is, the more comfortable the driving process.
5. Softness. Good tires for the summer cannot be too soft. The composition of the rubber compound from which they are made must ensure a smooth ride on uneven road surfaces.
6. High temperature resistant. Summer tires should not melt and deform when in contact with a hot roadbed.
7. Braking distances. Comparison of rubber of different brands does not take place without taking into account this parameter, because ride safety depends on the size of the braking distance. The shorter the braking distance, the more reliable the tires are.

In the automotive market, the choice of tires is large, you can pick up expensive or budget options. Based on the tests carried out, we have selected several tire manufacturers and have compiled the top - the best.

First place

Nokian Hakka Blue SUV Tire

These tires have an asymmetrical tread pattern and are designed to drive mid-size crossovers and SUVs. They have proven themselves to be excellent for urban use. They have a democratic price. Advantages:

• reliable adhesion to the road surface;
• short braking distance on dry and wet surfaces, provided by special notches on the central ribs of the product;
• resistance to aquaplaning;
• long operational period due to the reinforcement of the frame with special fibers;
• good drainage of water;
• reduced rolling resistance
• profitability.

Disadvantages: the products are not designed for long off-road driving.

Second place

Tire Continental ContiCross Contact UHP

The specified rubber is designed for mid-size crossovers. Showed excellent results when tested on asphalt and light off-road. It has a wide tread that gives the product grip on the road surface. Rubber provides good traction properties on dry and wet roads. Advantages:

• short braking distance;
• reduction of fuel consumption when driving at high speed;
• bionic profile;
• changing the contact patch with the road depending on the conditions (in bends, the contact area is wider than on a flat road);
• machine stability;
• reduced noise level;
• good water drainage.

Disadvantage: high cost, too tough.

Third place

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV tire

These tires are designed for various types of crossovers and SUVs. They have an asymmetrical pattern. Advantages:

• meet international quality standards;
• have good resistance to aquaplaning;
• practically silent;
• do not respond to ruts;
• great for city trails, provide a soft ride.

Disadvantage: the specified rubber is quite expensive, but its tread does not reach the off-road one.

Fourth place

Tire Pirelli Scorpion Verde

These tires are made from sustainable and recyclable materials. Designed for a variety of crossovers. They have an asymmetric tread pattern, compared to competitors' products, the pattern of the specified brand is more orderly. The tread grooves ensure maximum water drainage. Advantages:

• lack of aquaplaning;
• quick braking on wet and dry roads;
• no deviations from the course when entering or exiting turns;
• tires practically do not make noise;
• provide controllability of a large crossover at high travel speeds.

Disadvantages: excessive tire stiffness, high price.

Fifth place

Hankook Dynapro HP2 Tire

The products are designed for cars of the SUV class, designed for driving on a good road surface. When testing, they showed excellent results when driving on dry and wet asphalt, light off-road. Advantages:

• excellent grip on the road;
• reduced braking distance compared to previous tire models of this brand;
• improved maneuverability at high travel speeds;
• full controllability of the car, not only when driving in a straight line, but also when entering a turn;
• even distribution of the load makes it possible to extend the life of the product;
• low level of aquaplaning.

There are no significant drawbacks, the tires can be used for off-road vehicles.

Sixth place

Michelin Latitude Tour HP tires

These tires are designed to improve ride comfort on four-wheel drive vehicles... They have great wear resistance, reduce the amount of noise and vibration. The tires are perfect for urban conditions, light off-road conditions. The range of manufactured products ranges from R16-17 to R18-19. Some standard sizes have a reinforced structure and can withstand heavy loads. Advantages:

• comfort and safety of road travel in summer;
• reinforcement of the tire frame with a two-layer steel structure;
• uniform distribution of the load over the entire contact area of ​​the tire with the roadway;
• large resource of products;
• resistance of rubber to abrasive elements of the road surface;
• lack of aquaplaning.

Disadvantages: the cost of tires of the specified brand is several times higher than the price of competitors. During testing, these tires showed not the best results, but they did not become outsiders in any of the nominations.

Seventh place

Tire Yokohama Geolandar SUV G055

The tires have a symmetrical tread pattern. Suitable for crossovers and SUVs. The product showed low results in most tests, and did not take a leading position in any of the parameters. Advantages:

• low cost;
• the tires are practically silent;
• smooth running.

Disadvantages: relatively low grip on dry and wet road surfaces, low test positions.

Let's sum up

It is possible to choose good quality tires at a reasonable cost. To do this, you need to familiarize yourself with the reviews, ratings of summer tires for crossovers, choose the most suitable option for the operating conditions of the car. Consider: Tires that have taken the lead in most tests may be ideal for urban driving conditions, but very bad for off-road driving. For example, the tires that ranked last in our ranking lost the fight for the championship, but they are great for off-road driving.

Testing tires for CUV

The summer tire test was dedicated to R16 products 215/65. This is the most common and popular size for crossover tires. Our experimental "friend" during the tests was Renault Duster, the same popular pseudo-SUV on the Russian market.

About the subjects

For testing, we have selected 12 models of "motley" tires. The fact is that in the manufacture of a particular set of rubber for CUV, each manufacturer relies on different parameters. Someone endows their tires with good cross-country ability, someone "chases" the indicators of comfort and grip on asphalt, and still others are trying to find a fine line between these characteristics.

So, the following sets of tires have passed the test of summer tires R16:

• Scorpion Verde by Pirelli;
• Dunlop's Grandtrek AT3
• CrossContact UHP from Continental;
• Bridgestone Dueler H / T 689;
• Bosco A / T from Viatti;
• Geolandar SUV from Yokohama;
• All-Terrain by Cordiant;
• DynaPro HP from Hankook;
• CrossContact LX from Continental;
• Cruise 4x4 from Amtel;
• Latitude Cross by Michelin;
• Solus KH17 from Kumho.

About the results and tests. Wet track

After balancing each set of tires, we got the first test results. Less lead was used to balance Amtel, Kumho, Hankook and Yokohama rubber, most of which were required by Dunlop and Cordiant. It was a test to measure mass inhomogeneity. The fewer weights were spent on balancing, the better the tire is made.

We then ran tests on wet asphalt, artificially created with hoses and garden sprayers. Each kit has been tested 6 times. In the test for braking from 80 km / h, we did not stand on ceremony and recessed the brake pedal to the floor, since the Duster has ABS. Summarizing the results and getting the overall figure, it became clear that the best in this test can be considered the Pirelli tires, and the worst - Dunlop.

Curiously, when evaluating the tires for the perception of lateral loads on a wet track, we got similar results. The winner is Pirelli, and the Dunlop rubber model performed worst of all. What was the test? We tried to determine at what top speed our Duster can be kept when driving in a specially marked turn curve (radius 35 m).

The last exercise on wet asphalt was the detour of an obstacle, which, according to the terms of the assignment, suddenly appeared in our way. And there are no surprises here. On Pirelli tires, you can "dodge" at a speed of about 72 km / h, and on Dunlop tires only at 66.5 km / h.

On a dry road

With regard to the level of comfort. Unfortunately, the most grippy rubber was also the toughest. The Pirelli is not a comfortable tire. It is much more pleasant to ride with Michelin tires. They make less noise than other subjects and ride smoothly. In the rolling resistance test (gaining 110 km / h and moving to "neutral") Bridgestone and Kumho performed best, and the worst - Cordiant.

Off-road

Then it was the turn of the tire checker. To do this, we went to a special dirt track. The test winner is the Geolandar SUV. Duster with it perfectly "climbs" on steep and slippery climbs, well out of the rut. Dunlop tires also do not save off-road, but Pirelli, which have proven themselves on asphalt, with their "smooth" tread on the dirt road, are practically helpless.

Time to take stock

The layout is simple and clear. In the overall standings, the winners were the Pirelli and Continental tires (model CrossContact LX). We recommend the former for an asphalt road with extremely rare off-road forays, and the latter are more universal in nature, therefore it is better to purchase them for drivers who often have to move off the asphalt pavement.

Geolandar SUV became the best off-road specialists. An excellent choice for those who like to "knead the dirt". Surprisingly nice results demonstrated Viatti tires. Considering their cost - a great option for an inexpensive crossover!

Note. Most of the tires were marked "M + S", which means they can be used all year round. However, we deliberately did not carry out tests on winter surfaces, as we believe that specialized winter tires are better suited for most Russian regions.

Number of standard sizes - 67 (R16 195/55 - R20 2755/45)

Weight of 1 tire, in kg - 10.7
Shore hardness, in units - 65
Tread depth parameter, in mm - 8.8

Weight of weights when balancing, g / 1 wheel - 86
Where is it produced? - In Romania

CrossContact LX has been selected as OE for Duster (not in Russia). Our test proved that Renault did right choice... The tires do an excellent job on wet and dry asphalt, they are characterized by good ride quality and excellent acoustic comfort. They showed themselves with better side in the test for a sharp avoidance of an obstacle on a wet / dry road.

And if the owner of the crossover wants to go off-road, then the tires will not disappoint him either.

CrossContact LX is a versatile tire that is great for vehicles like the Renault Duster.

Pros:

• acoustic comfort
• smooth running
• stable handling on wet / dry roads

Minuses:

• overvalued

First-second place. Comprehensive final score - 8.50

Number of standard sizes - 14 (R16 215/65 - R19 265/50)
Payload - 850 kg (load index 102)
Construction type - Radial, asymmetrical view of the pattern
Weight of 1 tire, in kg - 12.1
Shore hardness, in units - 62

Speed ​​index - H (no more than 210 km / h)
Weight of weights when balancing, g / 1 wheel - 45
Where is it produced? - In Great Britain

Pirelli - best rubber in terms of safety, stability and reliability. But for excellent grip and excellent handling on the asphalt you have to pay with comfort. Tires "hum" on a rough road surface. Also, their degree of rolling resistance is high. However, the main disadvantage of rubber is its helplessness off-road. A Duster owner should think about it ...

Pros:

• handling and stable behavior on dry / wet roads
• high level of grip on dry / wet track

Minuses:

• noisy and uncomfortable
• not adapted for off-road

Third place. Comprehensive final score - 8.45

Number of standard sizes - 20 (R15 205/70 - R20 245/50)
Payload - 750 kg (load index 98)

Weight of 1 tire, in kg - 10.9
Shore hardness, in units - 66

Speed ​​index - H (no more than 210 km / h)

Where is it produced? - In Thailand

The Yokohama rubber tread has special serrated walls on the longitudinal grooves. They work great off-road. Renault Duster, shod in a Geolandar SUV, easily got out of a deep rut. And this is without turning on the drive on rear wheels.

Off-road tires have good ride quality on asphalt. Acoustic comfort is also at the level.

When "rearranging" the car starts to skid. It is necessary to correct the situation with the help of competent and fast taxiing. On a wet track, you need to be alert when entering a turn. The tires start to slip much earlier than the winners Pirelli and Continental.

An excellent purchase option for car owners who often drive off asphalt roads.

Pros:

• off-road qualities
• silent and smooth

Minuses:

• poor grip on wet roads

Fourth place. Comprehensive final score - 8.35

Number of standard sizes - 5 (R16 215/65 - R17 235/55)
Payload - 750 kg (load index 98)
Construction type - Radial, symmetrical view of the pattern
Weight of 1 tire, kg - 11.2
Shore hardness, in units - 67
Tread depth parameter, in mm - 8.2
Speed ​​index - H (no more than 210 km / h)
Weight of weights when balancing, g / 1 wheel - 61
Where is it produced? - In Russia

Viatti tires are manufactured at the Nizhnekamsk Tire Plant on the basis of new technology off-take. The tread design and tire construction were developed by the firm founded by Wolfgang Holzbach, former vice president of Continental.

Handling performance on a wet track is not inferior to the results of the test leaders. On a dry track and off-road, Russian tires are in the middle.

The tires have a well-balanced performance that, coupled with adequate value, make them one of the best tires in our test.

Pros:

• dry / wet handling and grip

Minuses:

• permeability is at an average level
• average comfort indicators

Fifth place. Comprehensive final score - 8.25

Number of standard sizes - 61 (R16 215/65 - R23 305/30)
Payload - 750 kg (load index 98)
Construction type - Radial, asymmetrical view of the pattern
Weight of 1 tire, kg - 9.9

Tread depth parameter, in mm - 8.5
Speed ​​index - H (no more than 210 km / h)
Weight of weights when balancing, g / 1 wheel - 43
Where is it produced? - In France

This rubber model from Continental has been designed and developed specifically for powerful and fast cars. This is what big choice dimensions and speed indices. For example, even 23-inch tires can accelerate to a maximum of 270 km / h.

But even at normal speeds, the tires show good and stable results both on a dry track and on a wet road. But there is one more "but". The tires tend to slip too abruptly into slides that are difficult to control at above average speeds.

The main disadvantages of the CrossContact UHP are the increased rigidity and poor acoustic comfort. It is not recommended to ride on poor quality roads on those tires. She will certainly spoil the impression of the trip, even in a good crossover.

What are CrossContact UHP tires in the end? This is a good quality rubber for roads.

Pros:

• wet handling
• dry / wet grip level

Minuses:

• low permeability
• comfort indicators

Sixth place. Comprehensive final score - 7.95

Number of standard sizes - 54 (R13 155/65 - R18 235/45)
Payload - 750 kg (load index 98)
Construction type - Radial, asymmetrical view of the pattern
Weight of 1 tire, in kg - 11.3
Shore hardness, in units - 63
The parameter of the depth of the tread pattern, in mm - 7.5
Speed ​​index - H (no more than 210 km / h)
Weight of weights when balancing, g / 1 wheel - 36
Where is it produced? - In South Korea

Solus KH17 is not a new model on the Russian market, but it remains competitive so far. Wet braking is almost on par with the Continental and Pirelli. The results in the "swap" and "turn" tests are encouraging, but it is felt that the car takes a hard turn due to too heavy tires.

The tires are very comfortable. But off-road problems arise. Even with the 4x4 drive on, the Duster floundered in a rut and seemed helpless.

On the other hand, Kumho has the lowest rolling resistance.

Pros:

• rolling
• braking performance on a dry / wet track

Minuses:

• not off-road

Seventh place. Comprehensive final score - 7.90

Number of standard sizes - 1 (R16 215/65)
Payload - 750 kg (load index 98)
Construction type - Radial, asymmetrical view of the pattern
Weight of 1 tire, in kg - 11.4

Tread depth parameter, in mm - 9.0

Weight of weights when balancing, g / 1 wheel - 34
Where is it produced? - In Russia (Kirov Tire Plant)

Cruise 4X4 is a rubber developed at the Kirov tire factory under the supervision of Pirelli specialists. It is the Italians who now own this enterprise.

The tires perform well on both wet and dry asphalt. In tests for handling on wet surfaces, the rubber goes into a small and controlled skid, but still the speed of maneuvering could be higher.

Decent budget tires, which are equipped with all Duster made in Russia.

Pros:

• smooth running
• price
• balanced and stable behavior on wet asphalt

Minuses:

• average rolling resistance

Payload - 750 kg (load index 98)
Construction type - Radial, symmetrical view of the pattern
Weight of 1 tire, kg - 11.8
Shore hardness, in units - 64
Tread depth parameter, in mm - 8.5
Speed ​​index - H (no more than 210 km / h)
Weight of weights when balancing, g / 1 wheel - 39
Where is it produced? - In Hungary

The DynaPro HP are naughty on wet trails. In particular, they start to slide early and tend to skid. In a real-life situation, this can be a serious problem.

The braking distance on a dry track can be considered good, but with a detour of an obstacle, everything is much worse. Lingering sliding and sluggish reaction of tires to turns of the steering wheel interfere with competently performing the maneuver.

"Middles". They are quite reliable, if not overclocked too much. But they have nothing to boast about.

Pros:

• dry braking

Minuses:

• wet grip

Eighth-ninth place. Complex final score - 7.85

Number of standard sizes - 26 (R16 195/80 - R18 255/55)
Payload - 750 kg (load index 98)
Construction type - Radial, asymmetrical view of the pattern
Weight of 1 tire, kg - 11.2
Shore hardness, in units - 60
Tread depth parameter, in mm - 9.3
Speed ​​index - T (no more than 190 km / h)
Weight of weights when balancing, g / 1 wheel - 74
Where is it produced? - In France

Aggressive tread pattern negatively affected the performance of the tires on a wet track. In the test, the "rearrangement" of the tires was noted only by stretched slides. On dry roads, the result is more convincing - slides start smoothly and predictably, making it easier to control them.

But longitudinally, the Michelin's grip is clearly lacking. On the track in dry weather, the braking distance is a whopping 6 meters longer than the Pirelli.

Despite the wide grooves and special lugs, the tread is not as good off-road as the Yokohama. On the other hand, the Michelin brand tires are distinguished by the best indicators of comfort in the test.

Pros:

• smooth running
• excellent acoustic comfort

Minuses:

• wet braking
• wet track handling performance

Tenth place. Comprehensive final score - 7.70

Number of standard sizes - 4 (R15 205/70 - R16 225/70)
Payload - 750 kg (load index 98)
Construction type - Radial, symmetrical view of the pattern
Weight of 1 tire, in kg - 12.3

Tread depth parameter, in mm - 10.0
Speed ​​index - H (no more than 210 km / h)
Weight of weights when balancing, g / 1 wheel - 138
Where is it produced? - In Russia (tire plant in Yaroslavl)

To balance the rubber, more than 0.5 kg of lead weights were needed. This is clear evidence of not the best workmanship. True, we received a pre-production batch of tires.

On a wet road, the tires demonstrate average results, and on a dry road they lose to almost all competitors. In the emergency braking test, the Cordiant were in last place.

Off-road tires behave well, allowing you to confidently ride the Duster with both slipping and pulling. Rubber also pleased with the level of comfort.

Pros:

• comfortable
• behave well off-road

Minuses:

• roll badly
• handling and traction on the track in dry weather

Eleventh place. Complex final score - 7.10

Number of standard sizes - 9 (R15 235/75 - R16 275/70)
Payload - 750 kg (load index 98)
Construction type - Radial, symmetrical view of the pattern
Weight of 1 tire, kg - 11.2
Shore hardness, in units - 61

Speed ​​index - S (no more than 180 km / h)
Weight of weights when balancing, g / 1 wheel - 49
Where is it produced? - In Japan

Bridgestone tires were disappointing on both dry and wet asphalt. It is characterized by inadequate and harsh reactions to the steering wheel, so you need to be extremely collected and accurate.

On a country road, tires will slip early. On our mud track, they did not cope well with the derailment.

The only advantages of rubber are good ride quality and rolling resistance.

Pros:

• smooth running
• low rolling resistance

Minuses:

• poor grip on any surface
• unsuitable for off-road

Twelfth place. Comprehensive final score - 6.85

Number of standard sizes - 28 (R15 215/75 - R18 285/60)
Payload - 750 kg (load index 98)
Construction type - Radial, symmetrical view of the pattern
Weight of 1 tire, kg - 12.6
Shore hardness, in units - 58
Tread depth parameter, in mm - 8.1
Speed ​​index - H (no more than 210 km / h)
Weight of weights when balancing, g / 1 wheel - 95
Where is it produced? - In Thailand

The braking distance on a wet road is 10 m longer than that of Pirelli tires. On dry asphalt, Dunlop tires also lose out to everyone and everything.

The only place where tires can perform well is off-road. They grip well and ride confidently on the verge of slipping.

On the asphalt with rubber Dunlop is better not to leave, but off-road - a good option.

Pros:

• passability

Minuses:

• very low grip on wet / dry roads
• unstable handling on any surface

The Za Rulem experts tested 11 sets of summer tires with dimensions 215/65 R16 for compact crossovers... Asphalt tires were compared not only with each other, but also with tires marked A / T (All Terrain). The company is interesting and varied. Do you think the results are predictable? No matter how it is!
Tires for crossovers differ from passenger cars not only in specific dimensions and increased carrying capacity. They have a stronger frame, reinforced shoulders and sidewalls. Manufacturers mark such tires with the inscription SUV or 4 × 4, or combine them into special model lines with original names.
It was. Nowadays more and more tire companies are leaving the 4x4 or SUV version only for heavy frame SUVs. For SUVs, most of which are front-wheel drive in our market and rarely move off good roads offer passenger car tires... For the test, the experts of the magazine "Za Rulem" gathered representatives of all classes.

Personnel

Of the eleven models tested, nine were created primarily for asphalt. Two of them, having no "crossover" insignia, are represented by "passenger" names. These are the middle-aged, but well-deserved "German" Continental ContiPremiumContact 5, made in France, and the youthful "Taiwanese" Maxxis Premitra HP5, brewed in China.
Four more subjects are marked with the SUV brand in the name, which indicates a crossover (reinforced) performance. Among them are Finnish Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUVs and Nordman S SUVs made in Russia, as well as representatives of Asia - Toyo Proxes CF2 SUVs from the Land of the Rising Sun and GT Radial Savero SUVs produced in Indonesia.
The rest of the rivals are special models for crossovers and SUVs with original names. These are the Pirelli Scorpion Verde tires with Italian roots, produced in Romania, the Dunlop Grandtrek PT3 "Japanese" of Thai origin, and the thoroughbred "Korean" Kumho Crugen HP91.
To show the differences between off-road tires and road tires, the experts included in the test two models labeled A / T (All Terrain). This is the Bridgestone Dueler A / T 001 - a Thai-made newcomer with an aggressive tread and Japanese ancestry, as well as an elderly domestic Viatti tire Bosco A / T. Its tread pattern is more like asphalt than universal.

Battlefield

By the end of summer 2018, it was possible to “mobilize” all the participants and deliver them to the collection point - the AVTOVAZ test site located in the vicinity of Togliatti. The air temperature during tire battles ranged from 18 to 30 degrees.
The popular Renault Duster was appointed to the position of the carrier car. Used only front-wheel drive 2WD mode. This allows for a more accurate tire comparison since four-wheel drive blurs the differences between rivals. And it's closer to life, since buyers of inexpensive crossovers often choose mono-drive versions.

Throw march

Testers first rated the car on a 10-kilometer warm-up lap at express road polygon, where at high speed they noted how clearly it keeps a straight line, how quickly it fulfills the driver's commands when steering, soft maneuvering and avoiding obstacles.
In this exercise, Nokian, Nordman and Pirelli were the top marks for the Duster on which the Duster behaves best. The GT Radial tires proved to be the worst of all: a complete lack of information content and indistinct reactions to steering turns during smooth maneuvering. It is noteworthy that in the battle with asphalt tires, the universal ones did not become outsiders.
Long-term experience of Za Rulem experts in measuring efficiency suggests: the worse the aerodynamics of a car, the less rolling resistance affects fuel consumption. In the case of Duster, the difference between the best and worst measurement results both at city speed (60 km / h) and at country speed (90 km / h) is minimal - it does not exceed 0.2 liters.
On Dunlop and Toyo tires, Duster showed the most modest appetite - for 100 kilometers of travel, it consumed 5.9 liters at 60 km / h and 7.3 liters at 90 km / h. The Nokian tires, which proved to be the most wasteful, required a glass of additive in both modes. Bridgestone and Viatti all-terrain tires once again stayed in tune.

And the dawns here are quiet ...

On the service roads of the landfill, where there are bumps and defects of almost all types of asphalt, the testers evaluated the effect of tires on internal noise and the smooth running of the Duster, including on a bumpy road.
The quietest were GT Radial, Nokian and Toyo. The most noisy are Kumho and Pirelli. They collected a bunch of complaints: increased rolling noise, sounding of road irregularities and rough asphalt.
Oddly enough, All Terrain tires once again performed on an equal footing with road tires, not inferior to them either in acoustic comfort or in ride comfort. Best of all, Continental, Dunlop and Toyo protect the driver from defects in the road surface, significantly softening shocks and vibrations. The hardest of all, shaking the car on large and medium bumps, as well as itching at the seams and cracks, Pirelli rolled - they are the least comfortable.

Notorious Rogues

Completing the march, the tester turns onto the dirt road. At a 12% grade, he assesses tire performance on loose surfaces. This is not an off-road test, although the test procedure is similar - to assess the traction efficiency with and without slipping, the suddenness of the wheels and the confidence when maneuvering. The results of this test are not included in the final standings, but are given as Additional Information for those who are forced to move off the asphalt for a short time, for example, on a country road leading to the country house.
A / T tires - Bridgestone and Viatti - behave much more confidently than others on the dirt road. On the "bridge" Duster rushes like a tank. The Viatti pulls less forcefully, but still good. And the most timid are Pirelli. It is impossible to get under way on them with slipping. The driver is forced to concentrate on subtle "manipulations" of the clutch pedal at the moment of starting, so as not to turn the wheels. On such tires, it is better not to drive off a hard surface.

Stop! One-two

Reliable braking is a guarantee of safety. Therefore, exactly half of 1000 points (the maximum that a tire can earn in the test) falls on the results of measuring the braking distance. Pirelli tires have the shortest braking distance on wet pavement: 25.3 meters. Continental and Kumho yielded only one tenth of a meter. The worst result, 32.6 meters, was shown by Bridgestone; he lost 7.3 meters to the leader, which is one and a half of the car body.
Continental managed to recoup on dry asphalt, showing better braking- 38.9 meters. And Bridgestone remained an outsider; the lag from the shortest braking distance was as much as 10.7 meters - almost two and a half hulls!
In braking, the weaknesses of the off-road tires appeared. Their aggressive tread is too "loose" for asphalt, and the size of the contact patch is smaller, which is why the braking properties are modest.

Workarounds

Further, the testers proceeded to the most difficult exercise - to a rearrangement, which simulates a detour of an obstacle that suddenly appeared on the road: at a distance of only 12 meters, you need to change the lane.
On the wet road, Pirelli took the lead with the fastest speed of 65.9 km / h. In the rearguard is Dunlop with a result of 60.6 km / h.
Pirelli and Nokian, receiving equally high marks, demonstrated their readiness for extreme maneuvers. And the least adapted to them were Bridgestone, Dunlop and Maxxis, which made it difficult to control the Duster.
All three received similar remarks: slow reactions to turning the steering wheel, which, with a sharp change of lane, has to be rotated at large angles, and the front axle drift in the initial phase of the maneuver. At the same time, Duster on Dunlop has pronounced understeer throughout the entire maneuver, and Bridgestone and Maxxis in the second corridor force him to take revenge with his tail. Dry asphalt brought a surprise: Toyo tires with a "through" speed of 66.3 km / h. GT Radial and Nokian follow closely behind them, losing only one tenth of a kilometer per hour.
Bridgestone hit the trail this time, its result is 63.8 km / h. On dry land, the values ​​of the "through" speed lay surprisingly heap - the spread is less than 4%. We assume that design features Duster (primarily long-travel suspension) did not allow strong participants to really open up.
On dry surfaces, Pirelli and Nokian confirmed their high handling marks. And the Continental, entrenched in the lagging bridge and joining it, made the testers sweat - the Duster, shod in them, annoyed with delays in reactions and large steering angles when maneuvering, as well as skidding in the second corridor.

Drill review

Six tires came out on top: their results were so close that three double places were formed in the ranking.
The show ends with a stand-alone (off-set) "all-terrain" category A / T tires. They earned high marks in cross-country ability, but due to the smaller area of ​​the contact patch and the greater mobility of the "toothy" tread, they gave up a little on the asphalt.
Bridgestone Dueler A / T 001 earned 791 points. Having shown weakness in the asphalt battle, he successfully demonstrated the important quality of the All Terrain category tires - excellent cross-country ability. The weaknesses - low grip on asphalt and difficult handling during extreme maneuvering - were quite predictable. But the acceptable level of comfort and moderate fuel consumption came as a pleasant surprise. Surely will appeal to those who travel a lot on unpaved roads.
Viatti Bosco A / T (854 points), which showed confident cross-country ability and satisfactory performance on asphalt, may appeal to summer residents and residents of the suburbs, who often drive down the dirt road.
The road-going Dunlop Grandtrek PT3 scored 834 points, placing it in the mediocre group. Economical and comfortable, with modest grip and ambiguous handling, this model is only suitable for careful drivers.
The eighth position was taken by the GT Radial Savero SUV with a score of 877 points. They distinguished themselves by low noise levels and performed well in almost all exercises. Only when assessing directional stability and adjusting the direction of travel at high speed did the GT Radial upset our experts. These tires are more suitable for urban driving.
The best of the good guys is the Nordman S SUV, which earned 894 points and finished in seventh position. It is well balanced - it will not surprise or disappoint, it will please with clear directional stability and high comfort, especially on long journeys.
The fifth and sixth places, with 903 points each, are occupied by the third pair - Maxxis Premitra HP5 and Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV. Maxxis tires offer high grip and attractive prices. However, it is better to avoid sudden changes of lanes on them. Toyo - the most comfortable and economical, provide clear handling and will be liked on any road. Only modest coupling properties did not allow reaching the leaders.
The next duo are Continental ContiPremiumContact 5 and Kumho Crugen HP91, which earned 912 total points and tied for third and fourth places. In the track record of these tires, high grip properties are noted. Comfortable Continental tires will appeal to motorists with a measured driving style, as they have flaws in handling during extreme maneuvering on a dry road. The Kumho is suitable for drivers of all skill levels, except that long-distance travel enthusiasts may not like the increased noise and mediocre directional stability.
The combined first-second place with a result of 934 points was climbed by a pair of participants who demonstrated high grip and impeccable behavior. These are Nokian Hakka Blue 2 SUV and Pirelli Scorpion Verde tires. The former are very comfortable and suitable for any road. The latter are noisy and harsh, therefore, good quality asphalt pavement is preferable for them.
The “universal” models presented in the test are only slightly inferior to the road ones on dry asphalt - in grip properties and behavior during extreme maneuvering, compensating for this lag with an advantage in cross-country ability. In other exercises - parity.

brand, model		Out of offset	9th place	Out of offset
Tire information
Country of manufacture		Thailand	Thailand	Russia
Load and speed indices		102S	98H	98H
		300	420	n.d.
		8,6	8,2	7,4
		59	61	68
Tire weight, kg		13,2	11,9	11,2
Braking distance (80-5 km / h)on wet asphalt (Maximum 260 points)	m	32,6	31,6	28,5
	scores	201,8	208,2	230,8
Braking distance (100-5 km / h) on dry asphalt (Maximum 240 points)	m	49,6	44,0	45,0
	scores	188,2	212,2	207,5
rearrangements on wet asphalt (Maximum 80 points)	km / h	61,3	60,6	65,4
	scores	74,4	73,6	79,4
Maximum speed fulfillment rearrangements on dry asphalt (Maximum 60 points)	km / h	63,8	64,5	65,4
	scores	57,7	58,4	59,2
Points total		522,1	552,4	576,9
Behavior: Expert judgment
Runtime manageability extreme maneuver on wet asphalt (Maximum 80 points)	scores	48,0	48,0	56,0
Runtime manageability extreme maneuver on dry asphalt (Maximum 60 points)	scores	36,0	42,0	39,0
and direction adjustment driving at high speed (Maximum 50 points)	scores	32,5	35,0	32,5
Overcoming the rise on a dirt road (Out of offset)	scores	10,0	5,0	8,0
Points total		116,5	125,0	127,5
Comfort: Expert judgment
Internal noise (Maximum 30 points)	scores	21,0	22,5	21,0
Smooth running (Maximum 30 points)	scores	22,5	24,0	21,0
Points total		43,5	46,5	42,0
(Maximum 60 points)	l / 100km	7,4	7,3	7,4
	scores	59,2	60	59,2
(Maximum 50 points)	l / 100km	6,0	5,9	6,1
	scores	49,2	50	48,4
Points total		108,4	110	107,6
		791	834	854
pros		Moderate fuel consumption; good comfort; high cross-country ability	High efficiency; excellent ride quality; do not make noise	Comfortable enough
Minuses		Low grip on asphalt; difficult handling during sharp maneuvers	Weak adhesion properties; difficult handling on wet surfaces	Below average grip; unclear course following

brand, model		8th place	7th place	5-6 place	5-6 place
			Nordman S SUV	Toyo Proxes CF2 SUV	Maxxis Premitra HP5
Tire information
Country of manufacture		Indonesia	Russia	Japan	China
Load and speed indices		98H	98H	98H	98V
Wear resistance index (Treadwear)		380	500	400	340
Depth of the pattern in width, mm		7,8	7,5	7,9	7,6
Shore hardness of rubber, unit		63	66	58	63
Tire weight, kg		11,2	10,8	11,7	9,9
Safety: Measurements of adhesion properties
Braking distance (80-5 km / h)on wet asphalt (Maximum 260 points)	m	27,6	27	27,5	25,6
	scores	238,3	243,6	239,2	257,0
Braking distance (100-5 km / h) on dry asphalt (Maximum 240 points)	m	42,2	41,6	41,4	39,1
	scores	221,2	224,4	225,5	238,8
Maximum execution speedrearrangements on wet asphalt (Maximum 80 points)	km / h	63,1	62,6	63,8	63,4
	scores	76,6	76,0	77,5	77,0
Maximum execution speed rearrangements on dry asphalt (Maximum 60 points)	km / h	66,2	64,5	66,3	65,0
	scores	59,9	58,4	60	58,8
Points total		596,0	602,4	602,2	631,6
Behavior: Expert judgment
Runtime manageability extreme maneuver on wet asphalt (Maximum 80 points)	scores	56,0	56,0	60,0	48,0
Runtime manageability extreme maneuver on dry asphalt (Maximum 60 points)	scores	42,0	42,0	45,0	39,0
and direction adjustment driving at high speed (Maximum 50 points)	scores	30,0	40,0	37,5	35,0
Overcoming the rise on a dirt road (Out of offset)	scores	5,5	5,0	4,5	5,0
Points total		128,0	138,0	142,5	122,0
Comfort: Expert judgment
Internal noise (Maximum 30 points)	scores	24,0	22,5	24,0	21,0
Smooth running (Maximum 30 points)	scores	21,0	22,5	24,0	21,0
Points total		45,0	45,0	48,0	42,0
Economy: Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption at a speed of 90 km / h (Maximum 60 points)	l / 100km	7,4	7,4	7,3	7,4
	scores	59,2	59,2	60	59,2
Fuel consumption at a speed of 60 km / h (Maximum 50 points)	l / 100km	6,0	6,0	5,9	6,1
	scores	49,2	49,2	50	48,4
Points total		108,4	108,4	110	107,6
The sum of the points scored in the test		877	894	903	903
pros		High speed of transferring on dry asphalt; quiet	Excellent directional stability; good running smoothness; low noise level	Very economical; the most comfortable; understandable handling	Reliable traction
Minuses		Mediocre directional stability when driving at high speed	No significant deficiencies identified	Insufficiently high adhesion properties	Mediocre handling; easy claims to directional stability and comfort

brand, model		3-4 place	3-4 place	1-2 place	1-2 place
		Kumho Crugen HP91		Pirelli scorpion verde
Tire information
Country of manufacture		Korea	France	Romania	Russia
Load and speed indices		98H	98H	98V	102V
Wear resistance index (Treadwear)		420	280	400	500
Depth of the pattern in width, mm		7,9	7,3	7,8	7,8
Shore hardness of rubber, unit		60	61	58	61
Tire weight, kg		11,2	9,6	10,8	11,2
Safety: Measurements of adhesion properties
Braking distance (80-5 km / h)on wet asphalt (Maximum 260 points)	m	25,4	25,4	25,3	26,1
	scores	259,0	259,0	260	252,0

If you are reading this material, then most likely, select a set of summer tires for your crossover. Immediately, we note the fact that in comparison there are only road tires of the SUV (Sport Utility Vehicle) dimension, because the average modern crossover (often having a drive only to the front wheels) spends most of its life in the city and on asphalt roads, and "attesh" tires with a pronounced "evil" tread are unambiguously inferior to "civilian" tires both in handling and in the comfort of movement on asphalt.

The review was attended by tires popular in the segment, which have been tested in different conditions by at least two editions. By the way, speaking of tests - the rating was based on the results of three tests.

The first one was organized by German magazines Off road and SUV Magazin. The tests were carried out in the winter at the Dunlop test site in Mireval in the south of France. Yes, summer tires were tested in winter, because in this area in the "cold" season the temperature is stable at around 20 degrees Celsius, which is quite consistent with our summer conditions. The Germans tested 6 types of tires with dimensions 215/65 R16.

The program included braking on wet surfaces from 80 km / h, braking on dry asphalt from 100 km / h, measuring the maximum safe speed when maneuvering, resistance to longitudinal and lateral aquaplaning, as well as noise and fuel efficiency.

Another German magazine Auto Bild Allrad tested 19-inch tires. In addition to standard tests on dry and wet asphalt, the wheels were tested for off-road grip. The results of these tests turned out to be predictably low, so they are not taken into account in the final ranking.

The third series of tests was carried out by the domestic magazine Autoreview. The tests took place in the USA at a special testing ground where different types of "parquet" wheels were examined. The program included tests similar to Auto Bild Allrad.

The list of summer tires included in the AutoDel selection.

Continental ContiCrossContact UHP

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV

Pirelli scorpion verde

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 4 562

Michelin Latitude Sport 3

Nokian Line (zLine) SUV - out of rating

Results of tests of summer tires of the 2016 season for crossovers (SUVs), segment carsSUV(Sport Utility Vehicle)

Continental ContiCrossContact UHP - summer crossover tires, test

OFFICIAL INFORMATION

When talking about the Continental ContiCrossContact UHP, the manufacturer primarily claims a bionic tread pattern, also known as cat paw technology. Its essence lies in the asymmetric tread pattern with powerful side blocks and four or five drainage grooves, depending on the tread width, which guarantees the ContiCrossContact UHP tire excellent wet and dry handling, even at high speeds. In addition, the official description states that the tire demonstrates excellent performance braking and control.

The ContiCrossContact UHP is a dedicated tire for powerful 4x4s. Its characteristics - including short braking distances and increased cornering stability - are fully in line with the requirements of 4WD vehicles such as Porsche cayenne or BMW X5. For wheels of a special size, there are tires in 23 and 24 inches, which is important for the tuning and high speed market. By the way, the tire is available in several speed indexes V, W, Y and Z (for speeds from 210 km / h to 300 km / h).

TEST RESULTS

German tires performed excellently when braking on wet asphalt, and generally earned high marks. Predictability is an important factor. Continental rubber- Loss of grip when maneuvering on dry surfaces occurs a little earlier than in Pirelli, but it happens "smoother", which allows you to react to the situation in time. In addition, the low weight and rolling resistance of the ContiCrossContact have a positive effect on fuel consumption, which also contributed to the overall high score.

Of the minuses, it is worth noting the tendency to understeer on dry surfaces and the high price, otherwise these tires are great for everyday use in city and highway conditions.

Note that not identical models of the Continental brand participated in all tests. However, they are all focused on vehicles in the SUV segment. In addition, the results allowed us to combine them in one row. All tires performed equally confidently in all disciplines, demonstrating mainly excellent balance.

Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV - summer crossover tire test

OFFICIAL INFORMATION

The Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV tire is designed for light SUVs, SUVs or SUVs. In other words, everything that fits the definition of the American abbreviation Sport Utility Vehicle.

The tire manufacturer claims the tire delivers superior fuel economy performance with the new Fuel Saving technology without sacrificing ride quality. In addition, the Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV summer tire is environmentally friendly, according to the manufacturer. However, for the client, safety and balance of properties are much more important. And this is also among strengths Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV.

TEST RESULTS

The Goodyear tires performed consistently average in most tests, only slightly behind the Continental and Pirelli. At the same time, American tires showed high resistance to lateral aquaplaning, and also turned out to be the quietest. Goodyear EfficientGrip SUV is recommended for purchase with stable handling in all conditions.

The positive picture is overshadowed by unpredictability during emergency maneuvering and low fuel efficiency. For this reason, fans of aggressive driving are better off choosing tires with more "sporty" characteristics (see below).

Pirelli Scorpion Verde - summer crossover tires, test

OFFICIAL INFORMATION

Especially for the Sport Utility Vehicle segment, Italian tire makers have packed all the technologies previously available only in tires designed for light sports cars into the Pirelli Scorpion Verde summer tire, aimed at crossover applications.

First of all, the tires are made of environmentally friendly materials and do not contain aromatic materials in the rubber compound, thereby reducing harmful effect on the environment both during production and operation. The tread pattern largely repeats the pattern of the flagship model P-Zero Silver, however, due to its application in suspended loads, the Scorpion Verde also has its own technological features. In particular, four wide drainage channels, as well as a network of multidirectional channels, thanks to which water is quickly and efficiently removed from the contact patch. In addition, the optimized tread block arrangement allows extremely confident maneuvering on the road with low noise levels. In addition, the asymmetric tread pattern allows the tire to evenly distribute the pressure across the contact patch, due to which the contact patch area is always maximized. At the same time, despite the fact that the Pirelli Scorpion Verde is designed for crossovers and SUVs, its main element is the city and the highway.

TEST RESULTS

Italian tires proved to be very effective when braking on dry surfaces, and in general showed a rather "sporty" disposition. Pirelli allows for good "annealing" on the track, but the relatively poor performance in the rain does not allow these tires to be considered universal. The Pirelli Scorpion Verde can only be recommended for use in dry, hot summers.

The disadvantages of Pirelli include a noticeable tendency to oversteer and a high susceptibility to wear. And in terms of fuel consumption, the Scorpion Verde was the worst according to both Off Road / SUV Magazine and Auto Bild Allrad.

Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 4 562 - summer crossover tires test

OFFICIAL INFORMATION

The high-performance summer tire Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 is designed for comfortable and powerful cars in the SUV segment, driving mainly on civil roads. When creating a tire, technologists paid special attention to three characteristics. As a result, it was possible to reduce noise levels by 4%, improve grip on wet surfaces by 8% and significantly reduce rolling resistance compared to a tire of the previous generation.

Enlarge image The tread of the Hankook Dynapro HP2 RA33 tire effectively removes water from the contact patch, reduces the risk of aquaplaning in the lateral direction, and improves grip on dry and wet roads. "Acoustic" lamellas - specially shaped slots - reduce the noise level. The increased rigidity of the center rib improves steering precision. The component stiffening rib, made up of individual blocks, reduces tire wear during cornering and at the same time improves handling. The wider treadmill and balanced carcass evenly distributes pressure across the contact patch and improves braking performance.

TEST RESULTS

In trials of crossover tires, the product of the Korean chemical industry has shown the most controversial results. On the one hand, the Hankook Dynapro was better than the Pirelli and Goodyear in braking on wet asphalt, while also delivering low noise levels.

However, these wheels have relatively poor aquaplaning resistance, long braking distances on dry surfaces, and low fuel efficiency due to their large mass. Thus, Hankook Dynapro exhibits both positive and negative properties in both dry and rainy weather.

It's worth noting that in absolute terms, the Hankook are not that bad. In braking on a dry surface from 100 km / h, the result of Korean tires was 37.9 meters, versus 35.1 meters for Pirelli (2.8 meters difference), and 36.4 for Goodyear (1.5 meters difference). In terms of the combination of qualities, Hankook Dynapro HP2 is suitable, for example, for residents of rainy regions who rarely go out of town.

Michelin Latitude Sport 3 - summer crossover tire test

OFFICIAL INFORMATION

For the summer season 2014, Michelin is introducing a new road tire with a sporty character for a wide range of off-road vehicles - the MICHELIN Latitude Sport 3. This is the third generation of Michelin's Latitude high-performance crossover road tires.

Even before the start of sales, the Michelin novelty had already been recognized by many leading automakers and received homologation for the original equipment of such advanced off-road vehicles as Porsche Macan, BMW X5, Volvo XC90. This recognition was made possible by improving several of the most important characteristics for consumers at once: reducing the braking distance on wet surfaces by 2.7 meters compared to the previous generation MICHELIN Latitude Sport, but also significantly improving the tire's mileage, durability and handling.

TEST RESULTS

The tires of the French manufacturer were somewhat "illegal" in our review, as they were tested only by Auto Bild Allrad magazine. However, it is impossible to completely ignore the once leading supplier of Formula 1 rubber.

In tests by a German magazine, the Michelin was rated slightly better than the Pirelli Scorpion Verde. This is justified by the very high stability of longitudinal and lateral aquaplaning, quiet tires and low rolling resistance, which affects comfort and fuel economy. However, the high price and poor maneuverability on both dry and wet surfaces resulted in a final low position in the rankings. From positive qualities The Latitude Sport 3 has an unexpectedly high level of off-road traction.

Nokian Line (zLine) SUV - out of category - summer crossover tires, test

OFFICIAL INFORMATION

Nokian zLine is another innovative development from an elite Finnish manufacturer that has many outstanding characteristics. These tires will be the perfect match for most powerful sports cars and will allow you to fully unleash the potential vehicle without compromising your own safety. Like a real ninja, they will give their owner loyalty, accuracy of all commands and complete silence. Most notably, the tires perform equally well on dry and wet surfaces, at any speed. Extreme loads, difficult weather conditions or poor-quality surface will not become an obstacle for this fast warrior of the roads!

Everything about the Nokian z-Line is about speed and safety. Thus, the “smart” silica UHP was applied. As a result of special cleaning, it generates extremely little heat, which guarantees the owner the durability of the tires and the maximum long-term preservation of all original properties, and if you add to this the reinforced structure of these tires, then, rest assured, they will serve you for more than one year. In addition, the mixture easily adapts to temperature changes, keeping the tread in good working order, even when the asphalt is on fire. The same property helps the tire to fully maintain all its characteristics on a wet road.

The basis of the high performance "zLine" is a modernized asymmetric tread. The outer and inner shoulder areas are equipped with powerful wide blocks, emphasizes the specialist of the Avitech company. At the same time, the outer shoulder is separated from the central part by a longitudinal rib, which limits the mobility of the blocks in contact with the track, which increases the stability of the car on bends. The ribs, located near the inner shoulder area, thanks to deep transverse grooves, ensure a stable position of the car on the road and guarantee precise control. The same grooves are responsible for the removal of moisture entering the wide circumferential grooves that separate the central ribs. Additional protection against aquaplaning is provided by the descending lateral grooves of the outer shoulder ribs.

The comfort is also worth mentioning. Nokian zLine tires are virtually silent thanks to the semi-circular grooves on the lateral groove walls. Reminiscent of the imprint of a golf ball, they effectively combat both external and internal noise.

TEST RESULTS

Nokian Line SUVs in the Off Road / SUV Magazine tests were able to demonstrate the best handling characteristics on dry asphalt, while on wet surfaces Finnish tires were second only to Continental. In Auto Bild Allrad's tests, the 19-inch zLine SUV performed similarly - high predictability and neutral behavior in all conditions, should have brought Nokian first place in the overall standings of "parquet" tires, if not for one "but".

At the very end of winter, a scandal erupted over the "tire fraud" of the Finnish manufacturer. It turned out that for 10 years the company had been sending specially prepared "rubber" to the organizers of the tests, the properties of which were often very different from those of serial tires. For this reason, it was decided to disqualify both Nokian models and invalidate the results.

Let's sum up

Despite the fact that crossovers currently account for a large share of the new car market both in Russia and in Europe, there are still not very many tires specially ground for them. On the one hand, this narrows the spectrum when choosing "rubber", on the other hand, the specifics of large-size tires do not allow openly cheap manufacturers to enter this rapidly developing market. As a result, the difference in the properties of crossover tires from different manufacturers is not very large. So, for example, when braking on wet asphalt, the difference in the results of the wheels tested in Mireval did not exceed 60 cm (from 25.9 meters for Continental to 26.5 for Goodyear). Thus, in terms of safety, all the presented models proved to be positive, and it is worth choosing, focusing on the budget and your own driving style. By and large, any of the tested tires can be safely used on your "iron horse". One has only to take into account the features of each specific tire in order to choose the most effective option for specific conditions.

Text: Eugene Fed