C-class cars. And this is not surprising. On the one hand, there is a fairly wide selection of economical, well-equipped cars, while the prices remain relatively affordable, on the other hand, the presence of many similar cars can even cause confusion. Which is better, a Chevrolet Cruze or an Opel Astra? Both are owned and manufactured by General Motors. However, these are by no means twins. Each model has its own advantages, and disadvantages can be traced. Let's talk about this in more detail.
Appearance
Fans of previous generations of the Opel Astra will not be disappointed. Continuity is visible to the naked eye. However, one cannot fail to note new trends. It seems that the body is generally devoid of right angles. All this gives Opel a modern look. Plus perfect aerodynamics and adds stability to the car on the road... The content also corresponds to the form. Although the Opel Astra cannot be called a racing car, dynamic and speed characteristics his very, very worthy.
Designers also tried to give it a certain touch of sportiness. And not to say that they did not succeed. For example, the massive grille gives the car a hint of bestial power and grace. The headlights are good. Elongated along the body, they look a little like the eyes of some kind of infernal predator. But the bumpers are thin - they even somehow get out of the general concept of the car.
If you choose Cruz or Astra, focusing only on the body, then Opel will win. Despite some good decisions, Chevrolet cruze looks unfinished. But in this respect it is perfect - nothing superfluous, everything is in its place.
Salon
Opel developers are clearly admirers of high-tech style. To be convinced of this, just look at the torpedo. You will only see such a number of buttons, toggle switches and other types of switches on an interplanetary spacecraft. It will take a long time to explore all this abundance. But it's worth it, because then you can control all the basic functions of the car without even taking your eyes off the road. Nothing bad can be said about the finishing materials, they are of high quality, there are no sloppy seams at all.
The Chevrolet salon also did not disappoint. High-quality materials, no less neat than the competitor's, the seams. The designers of the Chevrolet Cruze, when working out the details of the interior, were guided again. This is evidenced by the smooth lines of the trim elements, and the instrument panel, which the "wells" of the frames are divided into three parts. As a result, the dashboard looks so stylish that, all other things being equal in choosing an Opel Astra or a Chevrolet Cruze, it may well tip the scales in favor of Chevrolet. I would especially like to note the presence of many pockets, offices and other "nests". There is where to put small things so that they are always at hand.
Engine and transmission
At the service of Opel fans there are two. Both engines are gasoline. One engine produces 180 "horses", the second - 101. Depending on personal preferences, you can choose and. Are you a fan of active driving and crave total control over your car? Good old mechanics at your service. Drive mainly in the city and value comfort and convenience (even at a loss in dynamics) - take the "automatic". Fortunately, he is good on the Opel Astra: gears are switched without delays, there is a choice of various algorithms.
| Car model: | Chevrolet cruze | Opel astra |
| Manufacturer country: | Korea | Germany |
| Body type: | sedan | sedan |
| Number of places: | 5 | 5 |
| Number of doors: | 4 | 4 |
| Engine displacement, cubic meters cm: | 1598 | 1364 |
| Power, hp with. / about. min .: | 109/6000 | 140/4900 |
| Maximum speed, km / h: | 185 | 202 |
| Acceleration to 100 km / h, s: | 12,5 | 9,9 |
| Type of drive: | front | front |
| Checkpoint: | 5 manual transmission | 6 manual transmission |
| Fuel type: | AI-95 gasoline | AI-95 gasoline |
| Consumption per 100 km: | mixed cycle 7.3 | city 7.9; highway 4.7, mixed cycle 5.9 |
| Length, mm: | 4510 | 4419 |
| Width, mm: | 1797 | 1814 |
| Height, mm: | 1477 | 1510 |
| Clearance, mm: | 156 | 130 |
| Tire size: | 205 / 60R16 | 205/55 R16 |
| Curb weight, kg: | 1305 | 1298 |
| Full weight, kg: | 1818 | 1870 |
| Fuel tank volume: | 60 | 56 |
Chevrolet lovers have a little richer choice. However, more recently, the Chevrolet Cruze was also equipped with two motors. Namely, with a volume of 1.6 liters and a power of 109 Horse power for fans of minimalism and a volume of 1.8 liters with a capacity of one hundred and forty-odd "horses". Recently, another engine has been added, which, with a seemingly small volume of 1.4 liters, produces exactly 140 horsepower. Plus, due to its small volume, this motor has an enviable efficiency. In the dispute Cruze vs Astra, we put the plus sign for Cruze.
Road behavior
Test drive of the Chevrolet Cruze car:
As you can see from, Cruz is not a particularly powerful car. It is good in traffic jams in a modern big city (this is facilitated by excellent traction "on the bottom"), but on the track it will definitely lose to Astra. And at Opel, all settings are "sharpened" for high speed. Moderately stiff suspension perfectly "handles" all the unevenness of the track, well-adjusted steering will prevent the driver from losing control of the car in a sharp turn... Chevrolet's handling is worse.
Test Drive Opel car Astra:
Outcome
Let's summarize. The advantages of the Opel Astra can be considered:
- stylish body;
- good aerodynamics;
- futuristic steering column;
- powerful engine;
- good transmissions;
- excellent suspension and finely tuned steering.
The Chevrolet Cruze has no less pluses. Namely:
- stylish headlights;
- beautifully designed instrument panel;
- many pockets and compartments for small things;
- a large selection of power units.
So Astra or Cruze? It is very difficult to give a definite answer. Cruise is a little cheaper and, as mentioned above, showed itself well when traveling around the city. Element of Astra suburban tracks, however, it will show itself at traffic lights. But it costs more. So choose based on personal preference - both cars are worth buying.
Moreover, they are not only built on a common platform, but are even produced at the same plant. But whether the new Chevy is really capable of competing on equal terms with its European relative is a big question.
Presented
“Worldwide” Jim's car Chevrolet Cruze appeared in 2009. His the lineup started with a sedan, to which a hatchback was added in 2011, and soon a station wagon will join them. The Cruze is assembled at the GM plant in Shushary near St. Petersburg. The present Opel generation Astra, the world premiere of which took place in the same 2009, is already the fourth in a row. Its release is also organized at the St. Petersburg GM plant. In our market new Astra on sale since spring 2010, and it is available along with the previous generation. The hatchback is the backbone of the current Opel Astra model line, which, in addition to it, includes a station wagon and a three-door version of the GTC.
Looked
On closer inspection, the completely dissimilar interiors of our rivals are replete with unified elements - they have the same steering column levers, power window buttons and buttons on the steering wheel. But the interior of the Opel Astra leaves a more pleasant impression: the finishing materials are of better quality than in the Chevrolet. In addition, there is a suspicion that the light "canvas", which went to the upholstery of the Cruze's front panel, will turn out to be quite a brand. Almost all of the Cruze's 91mm increase over the Astra went to its trunk. Therefore, it has more volume, despite the full-size spare tire. But Opel has a double floor in the cargo compartment, the height of which can be adjusted.
Ride
The atmospheric engine of the Chevrolet Cruze is better "lucky" at the bottom, and therefore it is more convenient to crawl in viscous Moscow traffic jams with it. But as soon as a little bit of clearance appears, the Astra, with its explosive turbo pickup, immediately recoups. And on the operational space, and even more so does not leave the Chevrolet Cruze any chance. Opel's suspension is a little better - it works out bumps better and does not allow swinging. The Cruze has a slightly softer suspension, but hardly any more comfortable. Accordingly, the Astra rulitsya more pleasantly, and the turns are written more accurately. The Chevrolet Cruze can only oppose this with lighter gear shifting (on the Opel the effort is noticeable) and slightly better visibility through the side mirrors. This is clearly not enough to level the score.
Asked the price
Prices for the base Chevrolet Cruze with a 1.6-liter engine and a manual gearbox start at 562,000 rubles. Opel Astra with a 1.4-liter atmospheric unit and "mechanics" is estimated at a minimum of 593,900 rubles, and with a 1.6-liter engine it will cost 629,900 rubles. The most expensive Chevrolet Cruze - with a 1.8-liter 141-horsepower unit and an “automatic” - will cost 769,000 rubles. Opel Astra in the top-end Cosmo version with a 1.4-liter turbo engine of almost the same power and automatic transmission costs a little more - 794,000 rubles, and a similar car, but with the most powerful engine in the range - 1.6 turbo, 180 hp - will cost 849,000 rubles. Taking into account the superiority of Opel in equipment, we have an approximate parity.
Outcome
Editor:
The Chevrolet Cruze is a pretty good car, but it's kind of boring and spineless. He does not have vivid features, memorable features either in design or in behavior. In general, the Cruze did not "hook" me. Astra is another matter! Everything is in order here with charisma, and with emotions, and with pleasure from driving. The current generation of Astra is extremely successful. One can, of course, speculate about the difference in price and the advantage of the Opel that participated in the test over the Chevy in equipment and engine power. But even in versions with engines of the same size and comparable Chevrolet trim levels The Cruze is not so much cheaper than the Opel Astra that there is a desire to give it preference.
So, after a long time I decided to unsubscribe. Background: I thought the throttle assembly, then on the sensors, it turned out to be in the ignition module, in the process the flywheel crown was worn out, the gearbox housing was accidentally broken in the starter area And so =) For a long time I did not dare to write T.K. Nothing is as oppressive as a broken car ... Of course, I'm not the first to whom this could happen at the most inopportune moment. But in my case it was an option to change the position at work and life forced things! Now I am expecting a child and a wedding day, with which you can congratulate me.
So there won't be money for repairs soon, everything is for preparation and a loan for a car! Due to the hopelessness of the situation, a hole was dug. Of course, it is not over, but in full growth (170) you can stand with your head slightly bent under the car. The car was pulled from the house on a cable, but she did not want to start the option was 2 ignition module, fuel. This (2nd) time we were able to push the car in spite of the rain, with the help of neighbors.
The hole seemed a little uncomfortable, or rather short for my car, I had to remember crawling with a machine gun under obstacles. Crawled behind, and was glad that the suspension is not too low =) The starter was removed a long time ago. He took off the crankcase protection (What kind of rubber bands then remained, who knows where to shove from? Unscrewed the traction from the checkpoint (Do not believe if you also deduct somewhere that you need to set the reverse speed and then unscrew the nuts from the wheels. I also tried this, the wheels are all- turn equally =)) The only thing that is needed is to mark with a strip where there was a connection, I rub it straight with a screwdriver on the adhering dirt. Unscrewed the lower clutch housing cover.
Unscrewing the wheels is not a problem, but the nuts will be remembered for a long time! The nuts are specially bent so that they do not unscrew themselves. There were no suitable chisels in the garage, and a screwdriver and a chisel (the kingdom of heaven to them) were used. Somehow I coped with the existing tool, but in the future I will grow a small chisel =) Before the further procedure, a 2nd person is required, but where can I get it ?! =) I solved this issue by inserting L-shaped keys from furniture into the disks. Then it was necessary to find a head for 30! On the way to the store, I wandered home and found my father-in-law's (future) suitcase. From there I took (as it seemed to me then) a more comfortable knob, a long handle at the end of the cardan. But in the process, he seemed fragile.
In the vastness of the Internet, they also encountered the fragility of keys in the process of unscrewing such nuts. There were advice to purchase a cylinder wrench from a gazelle or zil. In the morning, I decided that if another existing key did not help, then on the planned trip, to get the army boots home, I would buy a new key. I took an ordinary crank (the head mount slides along the piece of iron). Fortunately, it turned out to be stronger, but I didn't jump on it (even the sole on the right shoe came off =)! nothing worked.
Everything was also aggravated by the steering wheel, which turned easily with the drives and was difficult to control. Thus, the key was constantly trying to scratch the wing. Nut did not give in. I found some kind of tube 15-20 cm in order to combine the end of the key and the crowbar in it, but it was only BLOODED =). I accidentally snatched out one of the neighbors and luckily he had a water pipe. Here's what worked for me! I asked my father-in-law for the same by phone (on ferrous metal).
I went shopping. Immediately drove home for shoes, at home my father almost convinced that a puller was needed to remove the flywheel. Next to the house, I went into the fasteners, the nuts turned out to be 30r each, I decided to postpone the purchase until the market. On Antoshka I went shopping first.
The very first seller rushed about for a long time in search of a puller for the flywheel of the VAZ 2110, and asked for help from colleagues. A little later they realized that he was not needed there =) I decided to buy a puller for the ball-type, just in case. According to the plan, the removal of the drives! (as it turned out, you don't need to press out your finger to remove it). What they didn’t offer on the market. Some kind of soldier (which, as it turned out for the classics) in one place 100r.
But the seller did not find it, he sent 250 requests to the neighbors - it looks like a bolt in a long nut =), In another place they explained to me that I did not need it. A suitable puller for a ball valve turned out to be 100r cheaper than others (250r is also pressed out of the steering wheel by it). On the market, the nuts were at the same price as in the store and bought here. The next day, it was necessary to remove the front wheel drives. There are 2 bolts on each side. (only later I learned that it was not necessary to unscrew the nut from the finger =)).
Then putting in all sorts of wooden blocks. I pulled the drives out of the box with a metal spatula. It was not difficult to unscrew the box (3 bolts and 1 nut from the stud, which seemed to be welded into the box, but there was more). It's hard to shoot it alone! After unscrewing, boards and a jack were placed under the car.
Slightly jacking up, with all the attempts to pull it off, something was in the way. And then I remembered about some kind of left support that seemed right to me =) (and I didn't see any sense in unscrewing the engine.) You can unscrew the support in 2 ways a) unscrew the nut from the top of the support and from the bottom b) unscrew the mount on the box from the support 2 nuts with side of the wheel and 1a under the clutch cable mount. I chose the first one. Further, the edge of the box brought it higher than the ball one by how much and lowering the jack lowered the box onto the boards.
KNOW! Oil remains in the drain box, which flows out of the drive oil seals during removal. When removing the basket, I again faced the problem of free rotation. But the strength to overcome her was enough only the next day. Lightly tapping with a hammer on the old wreath, he did not show off his feet from the flywheel (without any chisels and drilling to which some resorted!). On the same day, while the circumstances were developing successfully, half an hour before arrival, I threw the flywheel into the freezer. And he went to wash in the shower.
After a shower (min 20) I quickly put everything together. The next day I decided to install the flywheel and disassemble the box to separate the part that was broken, so it would be easier to transport it. But nothing worked, the neighbor offered to wait for his friend who said that it was NECESSARY TO UNLOCK the checkpoint FULLY. There you will have to unscrew the tightly tightened nuts, and you need to do this together.
He finally convinced me not to spin too much =) Taking the opportunity, he tried to take the box by car to the nearest service with argon. On the advice of a neighbor's friend, there was a pensioner who cooks well, but I met an inadequate reaction from the workers there. Everyone didn’t care and I was immediately told that they weren’t doing argon anymore (they probably thought they had to remove the box and it broke them) After a little persistence, one master broke loose and chatted with some grandfather and finally said that there were no welders. Having driven around the neighborhood, in the garages I spotted an advertisement with a spray can. On this day, it was not possible to get through and the garage was closed. The next day, having withdrawn the money, I took a walk to double-check the recorded number, phoned, negotiated 100r / 1cm.
T. K. The car was already absent decided to bring the box on the CART =). While it was time, I drained the gasoline from the filter to wash the weld and the splinter.
At the appointed time, I installed the manual transmission in the cart, turned on the 1st speed =) and on the gases! On the same day, before work, they did not have time to finish welding due to the absence of the 2nd person (it swelled after the vacation). On the second day, I took my miracle on the same cart =) that day was after the night shift, so I took everything to the garage and ended there. (in cm there was about 10 but I said that there is no more than 600r and will not be) They cooked more from the inside, from the outside only in the area where the starter does not touch. The next day, immediately after work, I went to Antoshka, the goal was to find a centering mandrel for the clutch, fluid for cleaning the carburetors (clean the box), and a boot for the fork.
Having bypassed the whole of Antoshka, no one had any mandrels! (Someone made a comment but who the fuck needs them? Now the clutch is complete with mandrels!) When leaving, I bought the cheapest carburetor cleaner 100r. (auto repairman like), they asked for 50 for the boot. I went shopping, there I found a boot for 35, one mandrel for 50 and one for 150. Slightly doubting the proportions that they should be, I went home on the way to the fasteners. Similar proportions turned out to be in the version for 150r (3 levels), but in Krepezhe for 150 it was sold the same as for 50r (2 levels). It was decided to return to the first store and take it for 50 rubles.
Only the edge was 15-17 and not 20. Later in the garage, the mandrel was checked and it was enough. Spun the clutch basket. Started cleaning the box from carbon deposits and dirt adhering to oil drips.
I didn't like the cleaner. Before him I used ABRO, his pressure is 2 times more, you do not need to rub anything, everything fell off almost by itself. (I bought it once for 220 in the fastener of the same 140r) But still it was not bad to clean it. Gram for 300 lighter! =) The next time I decided to install the box, I even called a neighbor who had nominated himself before. Only he did not succeed, he grabbed the oil level dipstick to tighten the box, then otmazalis that his wife was waiting for her to go.
Realizing the almost hopeless situation, I decided to strain myself and think of something. First, I threw the box under the car on the 1st piece of wood. Then, somehow, he threw the left edge onto the ball, and put a wooden block under the right one.
He put another piece of wood a little to the left and put a jack on it. Raising the left edge with a jack, I tried to push the edge further and further onto the ball, rearranging the bar before taking a breath =). Finally, the left edge had nowhere to move, but there was a place to rearrange the jack closer to the right. Lifting the jack, we managed to hook the box to the left support! This almost meant victory. Further attempts to combine with the engine did not succeed until I decided to substitute the 2nd piece of wood under the engine and raise it with a 2nd jack /. After making sure that both jacks are firmly in place, he unscrewed the support and began to loosen the 1st jack.
After the edge of the box pin appeared a couple of centimeters, I immediately put a nut on it and tried to tighten it. I didn't tighten up until I got the other bolts. Only after that I screwed back the left support and pulled up the box. In the place of welding there was a small depression under the starter, where I decided to cover it with a sealant. Next time I had to kill a whole day to install the drives! They tortured me on a level with the nuts =) I bought retaining rings for 3 rubles as it was written in the manual.
It's hard to remember all the dances with a tambourine and obscene chants after coming out of the trance =) Stick the right drive into the box as far as it goes, stick the second edge into the disk and screw it to the ball. Then, making a wooden block in size with a chisel, he hammered the drive into the box with a hammer through the nut through the nut (the retaining ring should go deeper and lock). After the hammer, you can also tighten the 2nd. After that, we tighten the unfortunate nuts and bend them in the slots. After assembly, I filled in the drained oil, etc.
K. There is no money for a new one. There was not enough space on the blog for a photo of a bottle with a hose =) I tried to start. The starter turns but the engine does not grab, from this I drew conclusions from gasoline or MZ (soldered). So the main goal of replacing the crown and welding the box is completed. Looking ahead, I will say that the car did not start up with gasoline = (on the module, a broken wire was again found, which, even after soldering, did not give the same results (drove 200 meters).
In the future, I will conjure over the MZ until money appears, and there I will either buy MZ or make a spark of God (for the same money) Article from the site: http://www.drive2.ru.
Chevrolet Cruze has successfully taken its market share. It is a modern, reliable car with the makings of a sporty character. Despite this, there are a number of competitive machines. They have both advantages and disadvantages compared to the Chevrolet Cruze. As a result, on automotive market there is a constant struggle between different cars trying to attract the attention of buyers.
Comparison of Chevrolet Cruze and Ford Focus
The Chevrolet Cruze has several advantages over the Ford Focus. Making a comparison, the main advantages are:
- more comfortable steering wheel, especially compared to the Ford Focus 3;
- good view from the driver's seat;
- perfect steering rack design, which Ford Focus 2 cannot boast of.
Decide which car is better Ford focus or Chevrolet Cruze, the choice towards the former is possible for the following reasons:
- good suspension;
- high-quality interior material;
- effective sound insulation.
The cars are in the same price range. Their cost ranges from 800,000 to 1,200,000 rubles. 
Chevrolet Cruze or Opel Astra
According to reviews from car owners, Opel Astra is prone to sensor breakage crankshaft... If it malfunctions, the engine becomes completely inoperative. The meter is installed on the tide of the oil pump housing. It creates a synchronization pulse due to which the controller determines the position and speed of the crankshaft. Based on this data, it calculates the moment of triggering of the injectors and the ignition module. Repair is possible only by replacing the sensor. Chevrolet Cruze is somewhat more reliable in this regard. The cost of the Opel Astra is in the same range as the Cruze of a similar configuration.
Cruz vs Toyota Corolla
Operation of Toyota Corolla will reveal the following features:
- many childhood diseases;
- the presence of crickets in the cabin;
- high sensitivity of the engine to the quality of fuel and oil;
- soft suspension;
- the cost is higher than that of the Chevrolet Cruze, and ranges from 1.2 to 1.5 million rubles;
- sufficient comfort.
Cruze or Skoda Octavia
Comparison of the car Skoda Octavia and Chevrolet Cruze is shown in the table below.
Comparison of Chevrolet Cruze and Volkswagen Polo
It will be determined that better Volkswagen Polo or Cruz, according to the following advantages and disadvantages of a German:
- absence of "childhood diseases";
- good cross-country ability;
- the cost is less than that of the Chevrolet Cruze;
- rear suspension breakdowns;
- slow warm-up of the passenger compartment.
Chevrolet Cruze or Skoda Rapid
Comparing cars Skoda Rapid and Chevrolet, car owners note the low reliability of the system for measuring the position of the camshaft on the Cruze. In some cases, the engine continues to run, but there is a significant decrease in power and an increase in fuel consumption. It is quite difficult to determine the malfunction. This requires a diagnostic scanner. The problem can be eliminated only by replacing the sensor with a new one.
Comparing Cruze to Mazda
Chevrolet Cruze and Mazda are analyzed according to the main criteria in the table below.
Comparison of Chevrolet Cruze and Honda Civic
The Honda Civic has advantages over the Chevrolet Cruze, on which the failure of the air flow sensor is often encountered. This leads to unpleasant jerks and dips in acceleration. The engine starts to consume significantly more fuel. Elimination of the malfunction is possible only by installing a new sensor. 
Chevrolet Cruze and Citroen C4
Unlike the Citroen C4, when the turbocharged engine of the Chevrolet Cruze is operating, extraneous sounds are often observed. The incomplete design of the opel phase regulators leads to the fact that the engine is diesel. The resource of the pump of the cooling system is also small, so it starts to whistle when you run more than 60 thousand km. These problems are extremely rare on Citroen.
At the same time, C4 often causes problems with the failure of suspension elements. The transmission is also not reliable. The cost of the car ranges from 1.3 million to 1.8 million rubles.
Overview of other vehicles
Another car in a similar price segment is the Kia Sid. The machine is characterized by good handling and safety. Kia is inferior to Chevrolet in the reliability of the main components.
There is no definite answer which car is better than the Chevrolet Cruze or Renault Fluence. The first has a more modern filling, while the second is a little more reliable.
Cruise replaced the Chevrolet Lacetti car. The car inherited all the best design solutions of its predecessor. The main advantage of the Lacetti is its lower cost.
The quality of the main Cruz knots compared to the Chevrolet Epica and Chevrolet Aveo is practically on the same level. At the same time, Epica has a lower cost. Experienced car owners, all other things being equal, recommend choosing the Chevrolet Cruze.
Another competitor to the Chevrolet Cruze is the Kia Cerate. The car is characterized by dynamism and comfort. According to reviews, the quality of the Kia is slightly worse than that of the Cruze.
A very heated dispute is going on between the owners of Cruz and Ford Mondeo... Both cars have similar characteristics and price segment... That being said, most drivers agree that the Cruze's handling is better on the track. 
The choice between cars, which turn out to be approximately the same in their technical data, turns out to be quite difficult. For example, which is better - Opel Astra or Chevrolet Cruze? They both belong to the same car class, and are also the brainchild of the same car corporation - General Motors. But this does not mean at all that these cars are absolutely identical. They have their advantages and disadvantages, which are worth talking about in more detail so that the issue of choice is not so difficult.
Comparison of Opel Astra and Chevrolet Cruze I would like to start with their appearance, because this is the first thing that most buyers pay attention to. Looking at Opel, I would like to note that its design successfully combines fashion trends, as well as good old "chips" that are liked by many fans of this car brand... The body lines have practically no right angles, which certainly adds modernity to the overall appearance.
Sophisticated aerodynamics of the body can significantly reduce fuel consumption, and also contributes to better stability of the car on the road surface. Of course, you can hardly count the Opel Astra to sports cars, but its driving characteristics are good enough.
As for the Chevrolet, it also looks quite aggressive and sporty. The radiator grill is made quite massively, which gives aggressiveness and brutality to the entire appearance. Also, the headlights of the car are made in a similar style, resembling the eyes of a dangerous predator, but the manufacturers clearly did not succeed in the bumper. It looks very thin, out of the general concept of the exterior.
Opel Astra or Chevrolet Cruze? If we consider them from the point of view of appearance, then we would give a slight advantage to Opel, because its design looks more logical and complete. As for the Chevrolet, it also looks quite decent, but looking at it, one cannot leave the feeling that the manufacturer has not fully thought out its entire concept, which is why it looks somewhat unfinished.
Car interior
The interior of the Opel Astra would certainly appeal to fans of the Hi-tech style. There are so many different toggle switches, buttons and switches here that it could well compete with some futuristic aircraft. Of course, this comparison is somewhat strained, but it really shows that the developers have fully invested in the functionality.
As for the upholstery materials, they are made of a fairly high quality. There were no rough seams, therefore, from this side of the issue, everything here looks at the level.
Salon Chevrolet Cruze is also made very stylish and high quality. If in appearance the car had not enough drive, then the sporty style clearly prevails in the cabin. The dashboard looks especially striking, as well as the flowing lines of the trim elements. If we compare cars in this component, then we would give a slight advantage to Chevrolet, because its style looks more aesthetic. In addition, it pleases the fact that in his salon there are a large number of different niches and compartments where various small things could be stored.
Transmission and engine
In the complete set of Opel Astra cars there are two power unit... Both engines run on gasoline, but they have different power ratings. The first engine has only 101 horsepower, but the second is much more powerful - 180 horsepower. The fact that you can buy a car with a different type of transmission is also encouraging. If you are a fan of fast driving, as well as full control over the car, then you can purchase a car with mechanical box gear. If you value comfort more, then automatic transmission is more suitable for you.
As for the Chevrolet, there is a little more variability in its lineup. Initially, this car was also equipped with two types of engines:
- One had a capacity of 109 horsepower with a volume of 1.6 liters.
- The second engine was more powerful - 140 horsepower with a volume of 1.8 liters.
Relatively recently, a new unit has been added to them - an engine with a capacity of 140 horsepower with a volume of 1.4 liters. With a sufficiently high power, this engine is very economical in fuel consumption, which is explained by its small volume. That is why the Chevrolet Cruze has a slight advantage in this dispute.
Specifications
Before answering the question, Astra or Cruz - which is better to buy for a comfortable ride, you need to pay attention to specifications of these vehicles.
First, let's look at the data on the Chevrolet:
- Manufacturer - Korea.
- Body type - sedan.
- The number of doors is 4.
- The volume of the engine is 1598 cubic centimeters.
- Power indicator - 109 hp.
- The torque is 200 Nm.
- The maximum developed speed is 185 km / h.
- Acceleration to 100 km per hour - 12.5 s.
- Gearbox type - 5 manual gearboxes.
- Fuel consumption is 7.3 liters per 100 km.
- Dimensions (LxWxH) - 451 cm / 179.7 cm / 147.7 cm.
- Weight - 1404 kg.
- The volume of the fuel tank is 60 liters.
- Trunk volume - 413 liters.
- The average cost is 1.157 million rubles.
Consider the similar characteristics of the Opel Astra:
- Manufacturer - Germany.
- Body type - sedan.
- The number of doors is 4.
- The volume of the engine is 1364 cubic centimeters.
- Power indicator - 140 hp.
- The torque is 200 Nm.
- Acceleration to 100 km per hour - 9.9 s.
- Gearbox type - 6 manual gearboxes.
- Fuel consumption is 5.9 liters per 100 km.
- Dimensions (LxWxH) - 441.9 cm / 181.4 cm / 151 cm.
- Weight - 1405 kg.
- The volume of the fuel tank is 56 liters.
- Trunk volume - 460 liters.
- The average cost is 1.198 million rubles.
- The maximum developed speed is 202 km / h.
Based on these characteristics, it can be seen that Chevrolet is inferior to Opel in some rather important indicators. If we compare their speed qualities, it is clear that over a long distance, in track conditions, Opel will win with a significant advantage. This is explained not only by the best acceleration and overall speed, but also by the presence of a rigid suspension, i.e. in Astra, almost everything is sharpened at high speeds.
During the test drive, it was also revealed that the Opel's handling is slightly better than the Chevrolet. This is especially important at those speeds that the Astra is capable of developing, therefore this car wins in this component too.
The opinion of motorists
Whatever the detailed technical data about a particular car, the most important thing is practical information from those people who operated Vehicle in different conditions. That is why, we will study the reviews of the owners of these cars, who know firsthand about all the advantages and disadvantages identified during the ride.
Consider the benefits of the Chevrolet Cruze:
- There is a fairly good climate control system that allows you to feel comfortable in the cabin at any time of the year.
- The steering wheel and seats are reasonably well made, which is very important for the comfort of the driver.
- The suspension is not rigid, but this cannot be called a drawback. The car feels great on the road, but it clearly does not pull the declared 180 km per hour.
- Quite good soundproofing of the cabin.
- The windshield is strong enough to withstand the hit of a few large stones.
As for the cons of this car, they are as follows:
- In rainy weather, the view of the side mirrors is significantly impaired. The fact is that the rain literally floods the side windows, which is why the rear visibility deteriorates.
- Fuel consumption is quite high, because in urban conditions it can be at least 15 liters.
- Low speed, which is explained by a rather weak engine and a large mass of the car.
- There are two versions of this car - with mechanics and automatic. So, some motorists highly discourage taking automatic transmission, explaining that the car will not survive the 70 thousand kilometers mark.
As for the advantages of the Opel Astra, motorists note the following positive points:
- Interior noise insulation at a high level.
- Suspension stiffness seems to be an advantage on the one hand, but it can cause problems in cold weather - it starts to blur and knock.
- Good handling on the road, as well as good ground clearance for this class of cars.
- Fuel consumption is quite economical in urban conditions.
The disadvantages of the Opel Astra are as follows:
- According to some reviews, it can be judged that the seats in the cabin are not very comfortable.
- Suspension stiffness can cause repairs in the winter.
- Poor vehicle liquidity. Even with low mileage and good condition auto, it can be sold at secondary market no more than half.
- The menu is quite confusing, so you have to spend a little time exploring it.
The tests carried out have shown that the reliability of the body of these cars is about the same. Therefore, there is no unequivocal answer to the question of which is more reliable - a Chevrolet Cruze or Opel Astra.
Summing up some results, we can note the fact that the choice in favor of this or that car develops, depending on where it will be used for a longer time. So, the Chevrolet Cruze is more adapted for driving in urban conditions, but the Astra also shows itself quite well here. Their price is approximately the same, but the operation of Opel will cost a little more in the future. If this does not scare you, and you like fast driving, then choose the Astra. But again, choice is a rather individual and subjective thing, which is largely influenced by personal preferences and tastes.
Videos on these vehicles
"War of cars" about cars Chevrolet Cruze VS Opel Astra
23 seconds about the acceleration of these cars (Cruz won)
Another green Academician about Opel
Anton Avtoman about Opel Astra Sedan
Big test drive deployed about the Chevrolet Cruze
